Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
The psychometric properties of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) as measures of mindfulness and their relationship with burnout and work engagement
Submitted: 15 April 2016 | Published: 25 October 2016
About the author(s)
Martina Kotzé, Business School, University of the Free State, South AfricaPetrus Nel, Department of Industrial Psychology, University of the Free State, South Africa
Abstract
Orientation: Given the increasing interest in mindfulness in the workplace, recent research recommends that the psychometric properties of existing mindfulness measures be evaluated in terms of convergent and predictive validity.
Research purpose: The research purpose was to assess the psychometric properties of the 15-item (short version) Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and the 14-item (short version) Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) in parallel on a South African sample. Furthermore, the research aimed to investigate the convergent validity between the FMI and MAAS as well as their relationship to burnout and work engagement (predictive validity).
Motivation for the study: Organisational scholars must investigate the most appropriate instruments for measuring mindfulness in the workplace. Doing so would allow an eventual meta-analysis on the construct and its relationships and utility in the workplace.
Research design, approach and methodology: For this study, a quantitative cross-sectional survey research design was employed. Convenience sampling was chosen and 497 participants applying for admission to a management and leadership degree programme at a South African Business School participated in the study. All participants of the sample are employed at either private or public institutions. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the convergent validity of the instruments. Cronbach’s alpha was utilised in determining the reliabilities of the instruments. The product–moment correlation by Pearson was used to compare the two instruments in terms of their relationship to burnout and work engagement. Stepwise multiple regression was used to determine whether the FMI and MAAS are significant predictors of burnout and work engagement (predictive validity).
Main findings: The results showed that the short versions of both the FMI and the MAAS are valid and reliable unidimensional measures of mindfulness. The findings showed that the two instruments are moderately correlated, providing adequate evidence of convergent validity. With regards to predictive validity, both the FMI and MAAS showed statistically significant relations with burnout and work engagement. Yet, the MAAS showed higher correlations with these constructs. A similar picture emerged with regards to the stepwise multiple regression results. The MAAS was the only significant predictor of burnout, explaining 12% of the variance. Both the MAAS and FMI were significant predictors of work engagement. The MAAS explained 13% of the variance in work engagement while the FMI explained 3% of the variance.
Practical/managerial implications: Given these results, the MAAS currently seems to be a more appropriate measurement of mindfulness in the workplace given its ability to better predict work engagement and burnout than the FMI.
Contribution/value-add: The study has provided much needed empirical evidence on the psychometric properties of the FMI and MAAS as measures of mindfulness on a South African sample.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 9182Total article views: 14287
Crossref Citations
1. The effectiveness of health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) model in people with HIV: A cross sectional study
Mahsa Abdollapour, Seyed Ahmad Seyed Alinaghi, Amir Sam Kianimoghadam, Abbas Masjedi‐Arani, Maryam Bakhtiari, Seyed Ali Dehghan Manshadi, Mohsen Rostami, Minoo Mohraz
Health Science Reports vol: 7 issue: 7 year: 2024
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2217
2. The Effect of a Brief Mindfulness Practice on Perceived Stress and Sustained Attention: Does Priming Matter?
Rhiannon Y. Ueberholz, Alexandra J. Fiocco
Mindfulness vol: 13 issue: 7 first page: 1757 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-01913-8
3. Trait mindful awareness predicts inter-brain coupling but not individual brain responses during naturalistic face-to-face interactions
Phoebe Chen, Ulrich Kirk, Suzanne Dikker
Frontiers in Psychology vol: 13 year: 2022
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915345
4. Anxiety, anger, and mindfulness as predictors of general health in the general population during COVID‐19 outbreak: A survey in southeast Iran
Alireza Malakoutikhah, Mohammad Ali Zakeri, Ahmad Salehi Derakhtanjani, Mahlagha Dehghan
Journal of Community Psychology vol: 50 issue: 2 first page: 916 year: 2022
doi: 10.1002/jcop.22690
5. Mindfulness Assessment Scales: A Critical Review
Eun-Mi Koh, Jung-Ho Kim, Mirihae Kim
The Korean Journal of Psychology: General vol: 40 issue: 1 first page: 33 year: 2021
doi: 10.22257/kjp.2021.3.40.1.33
6. The Relationship Between Mindfulness and Impulsivity: The Role of Meditation
Rotem Leshem, Or Catz, Ayelet Nave
Mindfulness vol: 15 issue: 5 first page: 1234 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s12671-024-02371-0
7. Self‐care among persons with heart failure: Examining the impact of mindfulness and impulsivity using conditional process analysis
Jehad A. Rababah, Mohammed M. Al‐Hammouri, Loai Tawalbeh, Hossam Alhawatmeh, Mohammad Hasan
Nursing Forum vol: 57 issue: 4 first page: 558 year: 2022
doi: 10.1111/nuf.12719
8. The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Relaxation, Meditation, and Mindfulness Experiences Questionnaire Utilized Among Patients with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran
Asma Najmadini, Radhwan Hussein Ibrahim, Xiaoqian Yu, Alireza Malakoutikhah, Mansooreh Azizzadeh Forouzi, Bander Balkhi, Mahlagha Dehghan
Journal of Religion and Health vol: 64 issue: 2 first page: 1419 year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02154-w
9. Testing a model of resilience for women leaders: a strengths based approach
Daphne Pillay-Naidoo, Petrus Nel
Australian Journal of Psychology vol: 74 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/00049530.2022.2138542
10. Efficacy of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention on the psychological well-being of health care professionals and trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method design
Iram Osman, Shaista Hamid, Veena S. Singaram
Health SA Gesondheid vol: 26 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1682
11. Mindfulness in Different Sociodemographic Strata: Partial Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in an Indian Sample
Buddhaditya Padhi, Nilamadhab Kar, Brajaballav Kar
Annals of Indian Psychiatry vol: 8 issue: 4 first page: 317 year: 2024
doi: 10.4103/aip.aip_42_24
12. The effects of mindfulness-based techniques on self-rumination, cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression among patients with major depression: a nursing perspective
Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Ayman Mohamed El-Ashry, Marwa Abd El-Gawad Mousa
Journal of Research in Nursing vol: 29 issue: 4-5 first page: 366 year: 2024
doi: 10.1177/17449871241252011
13. Mindfulness in teaching as a mediator between higher education teachers’ teaching and well-being
Anna Parpala, Petri Nokelainen, Milla Räisänen, Merly Kosenkranius, Ilmari Puhakka, Liisa Postareff
Discover Psychology vol: 6 issue: 1 year: 2026
doi: 10.1007/s44202-026-00726-3
14. Stress and Quality of Life of Patients with Cancer: The Mediating Role of Mindfulness
Mahlagha Dehghan, Moazame Jazinizade, Alireza Malakoutikhah, Ali Madadimahani, Mohammad Hossein Iranmanesh, Shahriar Oghabian, Fatemeh Mohammadshahi, Fatemehzahra Janfaza, Mohammad Ali Zakeri, Raffaele Palmirotta
Journal of Oncology vol: 2020 first page: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.1155/2020/3289521
15. Mindfulness Is Associated With Lower Stress and Higher Work Engagement in a Large Sample of MOOC Participants
Larissa Bartlett, Marie-Jeanne Buscot, Aidan Bindoff, Richard Chambers, Craig Hassed
Frontiers in Psychology vol: 12 year: 2021
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724126
16. Psychometric Comparison of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Veterans Treated for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
John R. Duffy, Michael L. Thomas, Jill Bormann, Ariel J. Lang
Mindfulness vol: 13 issue: 9 first page: 2202 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-01948-x
17. Validity Evidence of the Spanish Version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale Using the Rasch Measurement Model
José Buz, María Á. Gómez-Martínez, Antonio Crego, José R. Yela, Elena Sánchez-Zaballos
Assessment vol: 29 issue: 7 first page: 1576 year: 2022
doi: 10.1177/10731911211018855
18. Burned or engaged teachers? The role of mindfulness, self-efficacy, teacher and students’ relationships, and the mediating role of intrapersonal and interpersonal mindfulness
Nieves Moyano, Maria C. Perez-Yus, Paola Herrera-Mercadal, Mayte Navarro-Gil, Sandra Valle, Jesus Montero-Marin
Current Psychology vol: 42 issue: 14 first page: 11719 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02433-9
19. The influence of psychological capital, self-leadership, and mindfulness on work engagement
Martina Kotzé
South African Journal of Psychology vol: 48 issue: 2 first page: 279 year: 2018
doi: 10.1177/0081246317705812
20. The Psychometric Properties of the Relaxation/Meditation/Mindfulness (RMM) Tracker t Inventory in an Iranian Population
Alireza Malakoutikhah, Mohammad Ali Zakeri, Ahmad Salehi Derakhtanjani, Mahlagha Dehghan, Luca Fiorillo
BioMed Research International vol: 2021 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.1155/2021/2998916
21. Chinese Kindergarten Teachers’ Proactive Agency in Job Crafting: A Multiple Case Study in Shanghai
Chuchu Zheng, Yong Jiang, Beibei Zhang, Fang Li, Tianyan Sha, Xingjiang Zhu, Wei Fan
Early Childhood Education Journal vol: 52 issue: 4 first page: 639 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s10643-023-01455-1
22. Vocational identity as a mediator in the relationship between mindfulness and career adaptability among graduates in the early career stage
Natalia de Abreu, Ronel Kleynhans, Petrus Nel
British Journal of Guidance & Counselling vol: 52 issue: 3 first page: 431 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/03069885.2022.2106549