Original Research

Job insecurity, work passion, and work–life balance in diverse work arrangements

Chantell Ribas, Gerhard H. Rabie, Karina Mostert, Leon De Beer
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 51 | a2266 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v51i0.2266 | © 2025 Chantell Ribas, Gerhard H. Rabie, Karina Mostert, Leon De Beer | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 October 2024 | Published: 27 May 2025

About the author(s)

Chantell Ribas, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Gerhard H. Rabie, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Karina Mostert, Department of Management Cybernetics, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Leon De Beer, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shifted work settings, revealing gaps in current literature on how work arrangements affect employee experiences and well-being.

Research purpose: This study investigates the relationship between job insecurity, work passion (harmonious and obsessive work passion) and work–life balance flexibility-ability and flexibility-willingness in work and family across traditional, semi-remote and remote work arrangements in the South African context.

Motivation for the study: Understanding the relationships between constructs in this study benefit both employees and organisations by enabling informed decision-making and optimising work arrangements, leading to improved productivity, job security and well-being.

Research approach/design and method: A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted with 445 participants across traditional, semi-remote and remote work groups. Structural equation modelling was employed to analyse how different work environments influenced employee experiences and outcomes.

Main findings: Significant relationships exist between job insecurity, work passion and work–life balance. Job insecurity reduces work flexibility-ability and family flexibility-willingness. Harmonious work passion generally enhances work flexibility-ability but decreases family flexibility-willingness. In contrast, obsessive work passion decreases work flexibility-willingness while enhancing family flexibility-ability and family flexibility-willingness. These effects vary across work arrangements.

Practical/managerial implications: Individuals can use insights from this study to manage their job roles effectively, while organisations can tailor work arrangements to meet diverse employee needs, fostering a more resilient workforce.

Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to our understanding of job insecurity, work passion and work–life balance in diverse work arrangements post-COVID-19, essential for fostering innovation and maintaining a competitive edge in the dynamic job market.


Keywords

job insecurity; work passion; harmonious work passion; obsessive work passion; work–life balance; traditional work; semi-remote work; remote work

JEL Codes

O15: Human Resources • Human Development • Income Distribution • Migration

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth

Metrics

Total abstract views: 296
Total article views: 431


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.