Original Research
Psychological barriers to technology acceptance in South African workplaces: Investigating socio-economic status as a moderator
Submitted: 18 June 2025 | Published: 31 August 2026
About the author(s)
Mariella Noriega Del Valle, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South AfricaKarolina Łaba, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Claude-Hélène Mayer, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Orientation: Digital transformation in South African organisations hinges on employee acceptance, yet psychological barriers may inhibit technology uptake. Socio-economic inequalities may further shape engagement with cloud-based technology.
Research purpose: To determine whether socio-economic status (SES) moderates the relationship between psychological barriers and technology acceptance.
Motivation for the study: Given South Africa’s socio-economic disparities, psychological and socio-economic factors were examined to better understand workplace technology resistance.
Research approach/design and method: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 436 South African employees who regularly used cloud-based technologies at work. Measures included the Psychological Barriers to Technology Acceptance Tool (PBTAT). Descriptive, correlational and moderation analyses were conducted.
Main findings: Psychological barriers reduced technology acceptance (β < 0, p < 0.05), while SES was non-significant. Lack of psychological safety and low frustration tolerance significantly predicted technology acceptance (both p < 0.01). Self-efficacy, organisational trust and psychological availability were non-significant moderators (p > 0.05).
Practical/managerial implications: Psychological barriers should be addressed across the workforce. As SES did not alter their effect, training initiatives should be inclusive rather than tailored by socio-economic background.
Contribution/value-add: The study extends the Technology Acceptance Model by integrating five psychological barrier constructs into a South African workplace framework. It introduces and preliminarily validates the 62-item PBTAT and shows that psychological barriers inhibit technology acceptance regardless of SES.
Keywords
JEL Codes
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 348Total article views: 254
