Original Research

Psychological barriers to technology acceptance in South African workplaces: Investigating socio-economic status as a moderator

Mariella Noriega Del Valle, Karolina Łaba, Claude-Hélène Mayer
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 52 | a2342 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v52i0.2342 | © 2026 Mariella Noriega Del Valle, Karolina Łaba, Claude-Hélène Mayer | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 18 June 2025 | Published: 31 August 2026

About the author(s)

Mariella Noriega Del Valle, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Karolina Łaba, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Claude-Hélène Mayer, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: Digital transformation in South African organisations hinges on employee acceptance, yet psychological barriers may inhibit technology uptake. Socio-economic inequalities may further shape engagement with cloud-based technology.
Research purpose: To determine whether socio-economic status (SES) moderates the relationship between psychological barriers and technology acceptance.
Motivation for the study: Given South Africa’s socio-economic disparities, psychological and socio-economic factors were examined to better understand workplace technology resistance.
Research approach/design and method: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 436 South African employees who regularly used cloud-based technologies at work. Measures included the Psychological Barriers to Technology Acceptance Tool (PBTAT). Descriptive, correlational and moderation analyses were conducted.
Main findings: Psychological barriers reduced technology acceptance (β < 0, p < 0.05), while SES was non-significant. Lack of psychological safety and low frustration tolerance significantly predicted technology acceptance (both p < 0.01). Self-efficacy, organisational trust and psychological availability were non-significant moderators (p > 0.05).
Practical/managerial implications: Psychological barriers should be addressed across the workforce. As SES did not alter their effect, training initiatives should be inclusive rather than tailored by socio-economic background.
Contribution/value-add: The study extends the Technology Acceptance Model by integrating five psychological barrier constructs into a South African workplace framework. It introduces and preliminarily validates the 62-item PBTAT and shows that psychological barriers inhibit technology acceptance regardless of SES.


Keywords

technology acceptance; psychological barriers; socio-economic status; psychological safety; organisational trust; self-efficacy; frustration tolerance; South Africa.

JEL Codes

O15: Human Resources • Human Development • Income Distribution • Migration

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 10: Reduced inequalities

Metrics

Total abstract views: 403
Total article views: 277


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.