Opinion Paper

Aligning industrial and organisational psychology education with its dual mandate: A significant learning approach

Carin Hill
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 52 | a2402 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v52i0.2402 | © 2026 Carin Hill | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 December 2025 | Published: 30 July 2026

About the author(s)

Carin Hill, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, School of Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: Industrial and organisational psychology (IOP) is both a scientific discipline and a caring profession. Preparing graduates for this dual mandate requires pedagogical approaches that develop scientific competence alongside ethical awareness, interpersonal effectiveness and a commitment to human flourishing.
Research purpose: This opinion article argues that Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning provides a more comprehensive framework than traditional cognitive taxonomies for designing IOP curricula.
Motivation for the study: While Bloom’s Taxonomy remains influential in higher education, its emphasis on cognitive outcomes may under-represent the interpersonal, ethical and affective capabilities required of contemporary IOP practitioners. Given the Health Professions Council of South Africa’s emphasis on both scientific rigour and human flourishing, there is a need to reconsider the pedagogical frameworks that underpin IOP education.
Research approach/design and method: The article adopts a conceptual and reflective approach, drawing on educational theory, pedagogical scholarship and professional guidelines to examine the value of Fink’s taxonomy for IOP education.
Main findings: Fink’s taxonomy integrates foundational knowledge, application, integration, the human dimension, caring and learning how to learn. These dimensions closely align with the competencies expected of IOP practitioners and support the development of reflective, ethical and practice-ready graduates.
Practical/managerial implications: The article demonstrates how Fink’s taxonomy can guide curriculum design, teaching and assessment to foster both disciplinary expertise and professional capability.
Contribution/value-add: The article reframes pedagogy in IOP as a scholarly endeavour and offers a holistic framework for preparing graduates to address the complex human and organisational challenges of contemporary workplaces.


Keywords

industrial and organisational psychology; pedagogy; curriculum design; Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning; significant learning; higher education; professional competence; human flourishing

Metrics

Total abstract views: 402
Total article views: 351


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.