Original Research
Strengths use, deficit correction, thriving and performance of academics at universities of technology
Submitted: 11 August 2018 | Published: 19 March 2019
About the author(s)
Fathima E. Mahomed, Department of Human Resource Management, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark, South AfricaSebastiaan Rothmann, Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
Abstract
Orientation: Research regarding strengths use, deficit correction and thriving of academics in higher education institutions is necessary, given the possible effects thereof on their task and contextual performance.
Research purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationships among strengths use and deficit correction, thriving at work and performance of academics. Furthermore, it sought to investigate whether performance-related pay moderates the effects of thriving on performance.
Motivation for the study: No studies were found regarding the relationships among a balanced strengths- and deficit-based approach, thriving at work, and performance in the context of South African higher education.
Research approach/design and method: A cross-sectional survey design was used, with a convenience sample of 276 academic employees from three universities of technology in South Africa. The participants completed the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction Scale, the Thriving at Work Scale, a scale that measured perceptions of performance-related pay and measures of task and contextual performance.
Main findings: The results showed that perceived organisational support for strengths use, as well as individual strengths use and deficit correction, predicted thriving at work. Thriving predicted task and contextual performance. A significant interaction was found between thriving and perceptions of performance-related pay. The most robust relation between thriving and performance existed when performance-related pay was perceived to be good.
Practical/managerial implications: Higher education institutions must invest resources to enable academics to thrive at work via the balanced strength- and deficit-based approach. This approach should be seen as a core development tool for academics to increase employees’ thriving at work.
Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to scientific knowledge regarding strengths use and deficit correction, thriving and performance of academics in higher education institutions. It also resulted in new knowledge regarding the interaction effects of performance-related pay and thriving on task performance of academics.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5549Total article views: 7760
Crossref Citations
1. Enhancing learning of accounting principles through experiential learning in a board game
Carlos López-Hernández, Gloria Isabel Lizarraga-Álvarez, Manuel Soto-Pérez
Accounting Education vol: 32 issue: 3 first page: 300 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/09639284.2022.2059770
2. Employee Strengths Use and Thriving at Work
He Ding, Xixi Chu
Journal of Personnel Psychology vol: 19 issue: 4 first page: 197 year: 2020
doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000262
3. Strength use, training and development, thriving, and intention to leave: the mediating effects of psychological need satisfaction
Fathima Essop Mahomed, Sebastiaan Rothmann
South African Journal of Psychology vol: 50 issue: 1 first page: 24 year: 2020
doi: 10.1177/0081246319849030
4. The efficacy of employee strengths interventions on desirable workplace outcomes
Alexandra J. Bratty, Nicole C. Dennis
Current Psychology vol: 43 issue: 18 first page: 16514 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-05607-9
5. Personal Energy at Work: A Systematic Review
Alexandra Francina Janneke Klijn, Maria Tims, Evgenia I. Lysova, Svetlana N. Khapova
Sustainability vol: 13 issue: 23 first page: 13490 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/su132313490
6. Systematic literature review on the theory of Social Embeddedness of Thriving at Work
Listya Istiningtyas, Debora E. Purba, Elizabeth K. Poerwandari, Bagus Takwin, Mirra N. Milla
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology vol: 51 year: 2025
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v51i0.2229
7. A social work perspective of women academics’ well-being in the workplace: The role of personal resources
Bonita Maboeta, Izanette van Schalkwyk, Retha Bloem
Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health vol: 40 issue: 3 first page: 304 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/15555240.2024.2437801
8. Courage and equality – Women doctors’ thriving at work
Sadia Murray, Anita Bosch
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology vol: 47 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1924
9. Vitalizing to Learn for Service Proactivity: Not All Forms of Organizational Support Are Equal
Pin-Chyuan Hwang, Ming-Chuan Han
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research vol: 49 issue: 1 first page: 72 year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/10963480231168680
10. The relationship of university student’s proactive behaviour with demands, resources and outcomes
Charlize du Toit, Karina Mostert
SA Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 21 year: 2023
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2296
11. Strengths- Versus Deficits-Based Leadership
Jixin Wang, Marianne van Woerkom, Kimberley Breevaart, Arnold B. Bakker, Shiyong Xu
Journal of Personnel Psychology vol: 25 issue: 1 first page: 32 year: 2026
doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000380