Original Research

Assessment in multicultural groups: The South African case

A. J. R. Van De Vijver, S. Rothmann
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 30, No 4 | a169 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v30i4.169 | © 2004 A. J. R. Van De Vijver, S. Rothmann | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 October 2004 | Published: 26 October 2004

About the author(s)

A. J. R. Van De Vijver,
S. Rothmann, North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus), South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (132KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

It is argued that the 1998 Employment Equity Act, in which the onus of the proof to demonstrate the adequacy of psychometric instruments is on psychology as a profession, creates daunting tasks, but also creates unique opportunities. Recent developments in the assessment of multicultural groups are described, with an emphasis on procedures to enhance the validity of measures for all groups involved and on procedures to examine validity. Bias and equivalence are treated as key concepts in multicultural assessment. Four kinds of procedures for dealing with multicultural assessment (namely, establishing equivalence of existing instruments, defining new norms, developing new instruments, and studying validity-threatening factors in multicultural assessment) are described and illustrated.

Opsomming
Daar word geredeneer dat die Wet op Billike Indiensneming, 1998, waarvolgens die onus om die geskiktheid van psigometriese instrumente te bewys na psigologie as professie verskuif, nie net oorweldigende take nie maar ook unieke geleenthede skep. Onlangse ontwikkelings rakende die evaluering van multikulturele groepe word beskryf, met die klem op prosedures om die geldigheid van metings vir alle groepe te verhoog en op prosedures om hierdie geldigheid te ondersoek. Sydigheid en ekwivalensie word as sleutelkonsepte in multikulturele evaluering behandel. Vier soorte prosedures om multikulturele evaluering te hanteer (te wete bepaling van die ekwivalensie van bestaande instrumente, definiëring van nuwe norme, ontwikkeling van nuwe instrumente en ‘n studie van faktore wat die geldigheid van multikulturele evaluering bedreig) word beskryf en geïllustreer.


Keywords

Multicultural groups

Metrics

Total abstract views: 6348
Total article views: 10623

 

Crossref Citations

1. Cross-cultural differences in social desirability scales: Influence of cognitive ability
Aletta Odendaal
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology  vol: 41  issue: 1  year: 2015  
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1259