Original Research
A psychometric evaluation of the job demands resources scale in South Africa
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 32, No 4 | a239 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v32i4.239
| © 2006 S Rothmann, K Mostert, M Strydom
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 29 October 2006 | Published: 29 October 2006
Submitted: 29 October 2006 | Published: 29 October 2006
About the author(s)
S Rothmann, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaK Mostert, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
M Strydom, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (163KB)Abstract
The aims of this study were to investigate the construct validity, construct equivalence and reliability of a measuring instrument of job demands and resources, and to assess the differences between the job demands and resources in different organisations in South Africa. Stratified, random samples (N = 2717) of employees in different organizations were taken. Five reliable factors were extracted using principal component analysis with a varimax rotation, namely overload, growth opportunities, organisational support, advancement, and job insecurity. All factors, except organisational support, showed acceptable equivalence for different organisations. Statistically significant differences were found between the perceptions of job demands and resources in different organisations.
Keywords
Job demands; Job resources; Reliability; Validity; Equivalence
Metrics
Total abstract views: 7277Total article views: 8695
Crossref Citations
1. The efficacy of psychoeducation to improve personal skills and well-being among health-care professionals returning to clinical practice: a pilot pre-post study
Raul Szekely, Syrgena Mazreku, Anita Bignell, Camilla Fadel, Hannah Iannelli, Marta Ortega Vega, Owen P. O'Sullivan, Claire Tiley, Chris Attoe
The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice vol: 19 issue: 2 first page: 61 year: 2024
doi: 10.1108/JMHTEP-11-2022-0089