Original Research

A psychometric evaluation of the job demands resources scale in South Africa

S Rothmann, K Mostert, M Strydom
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 32, No 4 | a239 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v32i4.239 | © 2006 S Rothmann, K Mostert, M Strydom | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 29 October 2006 | Published: 29 October 2006

About the author(s)

S Rothmann, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
K Mostert, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
M Strydom, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (163KB)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the construct validity, construct equivalence and reliability of a measuring instrument of job demands and resources, and to assess the differences between the job demands and resources in different organisations in South Africa. Stratified, random samples (N = 2717) of employees in different organizations were taken. Five reliable factors were extracted using principal component analysis with a varimax rotation, namely overload, growth opportunities, organisational support, advancement, and job insecurity. All factors, except organisational support, showed acceptable equivalence for different organisations. Statistically significant differences were found between the perceptions of job demands and resources in different organisations.

Keywords

Job demands; Job resources; Reliability; Validity; Equivalence

Metrics

Total abstract views: 6764
Total article views: 8529

 

Crossref Citations

1. The efficacy of psychoeducation to improve personal skills and well-being among health-care professionals returning to clinical practice: a pilot pre-post study
Raul Szekely, Syrgena Mazreku, Anita Bignell, Camilla Fadel, Hannah Iannelli, Marta Ortega Vega, Owen P. O'Sullivan, Claire Tiley, Chris Attoe
The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice  vol: 19  issue: 2  first page: 61  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1108/JMHTEP-11-2022-0089