Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
Workplace bullying: A perspective from the Job Demands-Resources model
Submitted: 30 November 2009 | Published: 23 May 2011
About the author(s)
Anja van den Broeck, HUBrussel K.U.Leuven, BelgiumElfi Baillien, K.U.Leuven, Belgium
Hans De Witte, K.U.Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
Research purpose: The purpose of the study was to test the work environment hypothesis by applying the Job Demands-Resources model to workplace bullying. We expected job demands and job resources to relate to both perpetrators’ and actors’ reports of workplace bullying.
Motivation for the study: We aimed to extend the outcomes examined in the Job Demands- Resources model to a specific form of counterproductive interpersonal behaviour, namely workplace bullying. From the point of view of the literature on bullying, we aimed to substantiate the well-known work environment hypothesis with empirical data.
Research design, approach and method: We applied structural equation modelling on questionnaire data of a large heterogeneous sample of Flemish employees (N = 749).
Main findings: Job demands and job resources interacted in the prediction of perpetrators’ reports of bullying: job demands associated positively to perpetrators’ reports of bullying particularly under the condition of high job resources. Job demands related positively to targets’ reports of bullying, while job resources related negatively. These associations were (partially) mediated by emotional exhaustion.
Practical/managerial implications: These results suggest that workplace bullying may indeed be reduced by good job design, that is, by limiting the job demands and increasing job resources. Particular prevention plans may be developed for exhausted employees, as they are vulnerable to workplace bullying, in terms of both becoming perpetrators and victims.
Contribution/value-add: This study attests to the predictive validity of the JD-R model for perpetrators’ and targets’ reports of workplace bullying. The findings also underline the complex and multi-causal nature of workplace bullying.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 10068Total article views: 23936
Crossref Citations
1. Mimetic desire and mirror neurons: the consciousness of workplace bullying
Christian Lebreton, Damien Richard, Helene Cristini
Problems and Perspectives in Management vol: 17 issue: 1 first page: 103 year: 2019
doi: 10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.10
2. Workplace Bullying in Academia: A Conditional Process Model
Alan K. Goodboy, Matthew M. Martin, Carol B. Mills, Cathlin V. Clark-Gordon
Management Communication Quarterly vol: 36 issue: 4 first page: 664 year: 2022
doi: 10.1177/08933189221103625
3. Qualitative exploration of workplace demands, resources and bullying among teachers in South African schools: Implications for individual and organisational well being
Colleen Bernstein, Toni Paige Batchelor
South African Journal of Education vol: 42 issue: 2 first page: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.15700/saje.v42n2a2081
4. A dual-process model of diversity outcomes: The case South African police service in the Pretoria area
Leon T.B. Jackson, Fons J.R. Van de Vijver, Davey H. Molokoane
SA Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 11 issue: 1 year: 2013
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.504
5. Do Personal Dispositions Affect the Relationship Between Psychosocial Working Conditions and Workplace Bullying?
Laura Francioli, Annie Høgh, Paul Maurice Conway, Giovanni Costa, Robert Karasek, Åse Marie Hansen
Ethics & Behavior vol: 26 issue: 6 first page: 451 year: 2016
doi: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1043367
6. Job demands, health, and absenteeism: does bullying make things worse?
Dwayne Devonish
Employee Relations vol: 36 issue: 2 first page: 165 year: 2013
doi: 10.1108/ER-01-2013-0011
7. Exploring key job demands and resources in Norwegian child mental health services: a cross-sectional study of associations with and relationship between compassion satisfaction, burnout, secondary traumatic stress and turnover intention
Samira Aminihajibashi, Tine K. Jensen, Ane-Marthe Solheim Skar
Frontiers in Public Health vol: 12 year: 2024
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1304345
8. Workplace bullying: consequences, causes and controls (part two)
Steven H. Appelbaum, Gary Semerjian, Krishan Mohan
Industrial and Commercial Training vol: 44 issue: 6 first page: 337 year: 2012
doi: 10.1108/00197851211254770
9. İŞYERİNDE MOBBING DAVRANIŞINA İLİŞKİN META ANALİZ TEMELLİ BİR ARAŞTIRMA
Esin Bengü CERAN, İbrahim PINAR
Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi vol: 15 issue: 1 first page: 237 year: 2022
doi: 10.17218/hititsbd.1115949
10. The perceived risk of being infected at work: An application of the job demands–resources model to workplace safety during the COVID-19 outbreak
Alessandra Falco, Damiano Girardi, Laura Dal Corso, Murat Yıldırım, Daniela Converso, Dana Unger
PLOS ONE vol: 16 issue: 9 first page: e0257197 year: 2021
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257197
11. Targets' Social Relationships as Antecedents and Consequences of Workplace Bullying: A Social Network Perspective
Birgit Pauksztat, Denise Salin
Frontiers in Psychology vol: 10 year: 2020
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03077
12. The making and breaking of workplace bullying perpetration: A systematic review on the antecedents, moderators, mediators, outcomes of perpetration and suggestions for organizations
Gülüm Özer, Jordi Escartín
Aggression and Violent Behavior vol: 69 first page: 101823 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2023.101823
13. Work-related factors associated with psychological distress among social workers
Maya Kagan, Michal Itzick
European Journal of Social Work vol: 22 issue: 1 first page: 30 year: 2019
doi: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1357021
14. The prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of workplace bullying among junior doctors: a systematic review
Ely Zarina Samsudin, Marzuki Isahak, Sanjay Rampal
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology first page: 1 year: 2018
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1502171
15. Risk factors for workplace bullying, severe psychological distress and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic among the general working population in Japan: a large-scale cross-sectional study
Kanami Tsuno, Takahiro Tabuchi
BMJ Open vol: 12 issue: 11 first page: e059860 year: 2022
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059860
16. Buridan’s ass syndrome: Dilemma of the human resources practitioner in workplace bullying
Manasseh Mokgolo, Antoni Barnard
SA Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 17 year: 2019
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1124
17. Workplace bullying: consequences, causes and controls (part one)
Steven H. Appelbaum, Gary Semerjian, Krishan Mohan
Industrial and Commercial Training vol: 44 issue: 4 first page: 203 year: 2012
doi: 10.1108/00197851211231478
18. Work-unit measures of psychosocial job stressors and onset of bullying: a 2-year follow-up study
Laura A. Rudkjoebing, Åse Marie Hansen, Reiner Rugulies, Henrik Kolstad, Jens Peter Bonde
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health vol: 95 issue: 1 first page: 117 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01777-w
19. The reverse buffering effect of workplace attachment style on the relationship between workplace bullying and work engagement
Jean-Félix Hamel, Pierpaolo Iodice, Klara Radic, Fabrizio Scrima
Frontiers in Psychology vol: 14 year: 2023
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112864
20. Organisational antecedents of workplace victimisation: The role of organisational climate, culture, leadership, support, and justice in predicting junior doctors' exposure to bullying at work
Ely Zarina Samsudin, Marzuki Isahak, Sanjay Rampal, Ismail Rosnah, Mohd Idzwan Zakaria
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management vol: 35 issue: 1 first page: 346 year: 2020
doi: 10.1002/hpm.2926