Original Research
Exploring a model for finding meaning in the changing world of work (Part 2)
Submitted: 11 February 2011 | Published: 05 June 2012
About the author(s)
Daniel H. Burger, University of Johannesburg, South AfricaFreddie Crous, University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Gert Roodt, University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Research purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore further a model an earlier paper proposed for using employees’ experiences of meaning in work contexts to facilitate changes.
Motivation for the study: The researchers could not find a comprehensive model in the literature for addressing employees’ experiences of meaning in, or at, work during organisational changes. A previous paper proposed such a model, but it addressed only one component fully. This article seeks to explore this model further to address this apparent gap in the literature.
Research design, approach and method: The researchers used a literature review to conduct the study. The components of the model directed this review in order to find meaning at work.
Main findings: The actions of organisations, which aim to create positive organisational contexts (through practices for improving meaning at work and transcendence) and to frame changes using ‘Logo-OD’, can improve employees’ experiences of meaning during organisational changes.
Practical/managerial implications: Understanding the relationship between meaning and organisational change, and applying the model this article presents, can contribute to the overall success of change initiatives.
Contribution/value-add: This study’s primary contribution stems from the novel framework it presents for organisations to use the knowledge about how employees search for meaning to facilitate changes.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 6774Total article views: 15215
Crossref Citations
1. Enhancing the well-being of support services staff in higher education: The power of appreciation
Laurika Van Straaten, Annelize Du Plessis, S.P. Fanus Van Tonder
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology vol: 42 issue: 1 year: 2016
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1301