Article Information

Authors:
Katharina Vogt1
Gregor J. Jenny1,2
Georg F. Bauer1,2

Affiliations:
1Public and Organizational Health, Center for Organizational and Occupational Sciences, ETH Zurich, Switzerland

2Division Public and Organizational Health, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland

Correspondence to:
Katharina Vogt

Postal address:
Weinbergstrasse 109, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

Dates:
Received: 20 Mar. 2013
Accepted: 05 July 2013
Published: 16 Sept. 2013

How to cite this article:
Vogt, K., Jenny, G.J., & Bauer, G.F. (2013). Comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness at work: Construct validity of a scale measuring work-related sense of coherence. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 39(1), Art. #1111, 8 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/
sajip.v39i1.1111

Copyright Notice:
© 2013. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness at work: Construct validity of a scale measuring work-related sense of coherence
In This Original Research...
Open Access
• Abstract
• Introduction
• Literature review
   • Sense of coherence in the context of work
   • Context-specific sense of coherence
   • The concept of a work-related sense of coherence
   • The present study
• Research design
   • Research approach
   • Research method
      • Research participants
      • Measuring instruments
      • Research procedure
      • Statistical analysis
• Results
   • Invariance tests
   • Relationship between job resources, job demands and the work-related sense of coherence
   • Work-related sense of coherence as a partial mediator between job resources and work engagement
   • Work-related sense of coherence as a partial mediator between job demands and exhaustion
• Discussion
   • Limitations of the study and further research
   • Conclusion
• Acknowledgements
   • Competing interests
   • Authors’ contributions
• References
Abstract

Orientation: Work-related sense of coherence (Work-SoC) is defined as the perceived comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness of an individual’s current work situation. 

Research purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the factorial invariance and the construct validity of a scale that measures Work-SoC. 

Motivation for the study: It might be useful to specifically apply the concept of sense of coherence to the work context. 

Research design, approach and method: Statistical analysis was performed on cross-sectional (n = 3412) and longitudinal (n = 1286) questionnaire data collected in eight medium to large Swiss companies from diverse economic sectors (four industrial-production companies, one food-processing company, one public-administration service and two hospitals). The dataset therefore covers a broad range of different occupational groups.

Main findings: Multiple-group analyses indicated that the scale’s factor structure remains invariant across different employee groups and across time. High values in job resources were related to high values in Work-SoC whereas high values in job demands were related to low values in Work-SoC. Furthermore, Work-SoC acted as a partial mediator between job resources and work engagement. 

Practical/managerial implications: It can be concluded that Work-SoC might serve as a practical screening instrument for assessing an employee’s perception of the potential health-promoting qualities of his or her current work situation.

Contribution/value-add: The study advances both the salutogenic theory and the field of positive occupational health psychology by redefining sense of coherence as an interactional and context-specific construct that is useful for intervention research. 

Introduction

Sense of coherence (SoC) is defined as a global and nonspecific orientation that captures an individual’s perception of life as being comprehensible, manageable and meaningful (Antonovsky, 1987b). It has been consistently found that individuals with a strong SoC are healthier than those with a weak SoC (Eriksson & Lindström, 2006), making this an interesting concept for those concerned with health and its promotion.

However, since general SoC is primarily formed during early life and is also influenced by life experiences outside work (Antonovsky, 1987b), a more context-specific definition of SoC might be useful for the planning and evaluation of health-related interventions in the workplace. The central aim of this article is therefore to introduce the concept of work-related sense of coherence (Work-SoC) and to investigate the factorial invariance and construct validity of a newly developed scale measuring Work-SoC.

In the first section below, an overview of the literature on SoC in the context of work will be provided. Then a number of context-specific applications of SoC will be discussed, and the concept of Work-SoC will be introduced. In the second section, the research design is presented, which is followed by a section on the results concerning the factorial invariance and the construct validity of a scale measuring Work-SoC. In the last section, the results and their implications are discussed.

Literature review

Sense of coherence in the context of work
A number of studies examined SoC in the context of work. Feldt (1997) reports that technical designers with a high level of SoC experience fewer psychosomatic symptoms and less emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, some support was found for a moderating effect, suggesting that those employees with higher levels of SoC cope more efficiently with work stressors than those with lower levels of SoC. In line with this, Albertsen, Nielsen and Borg (2001) report that employees with a strong SoC experience fewer stress symptoms and cope more efficiently with strain in the work environment. Similar results are reported by Kinman (2008), who found that academic employees with a stronger SoC tend to be in better physical and psychological health than those with a weaker SoC. Moreover, she reports that employees with a strong SoC might be protected from the negative impact of some job-related stressors such as high work-home interface demands. Longitudinal analyses show that a high level of SoC might decrease the risk of developing burnout symptoms 10 years later (Kalimo, Pahkin, Mutanen & Toppinen-Tanner, 2003) and that SoC might protect against the negative effects of organisational change on mental health (Pahkin, Väänänen, Koskinen, Bergbom & Kouvonen, 2011). Van der Colff and Rothmann (2009) report that SoC is not only related to lower levels of exhaustion but also to higher levels of positive outcomes such as work engagement. These authors reason that employees with a high SoC are more likely to perceive their environment in a positive and coherent way and use approach coping strategies rather than avoidance coping strategies. These results are complemented by a study by Muller and Rothmann (2009), who performed a content analysis of written replies from 600 employees and found that their perception of helping factors and restraining factors differed depending on their SoC level. Individuals with a high SoC might also have an increased ability to change their work characteristics in a favourable way, as reported in a three-year follow-up study by Feldt, Kivimäki, Rantala and Tolvanen (2004).

These results suggest that SoC plays an important role in the health-related effects of working conditions, that it might influence perception and coping mechanisms and that it might act as a predictor of work characteristics. However, it could also be argued that work affects the SoC of employees. Feldt, Kinnunen and Mauno (2000) conducted a one-year follow-up study and found that SoC partly mediates the relationship between a good organisational climate and well-being and between low job insecurity and well-being. Furthermore, changes in organisational climate and leadership relations were associated with changes in SoC. Similarly, the studies by Albertsen et al. (2001) and Hogh and Mikkelsen (2005) both report that SoC partly explains the relationship between work environment and stress symptoms.

The idea that working conditions might influence SoC is in line with Antonovsky’s (1987a, 1987b) suggestion that the concept of SoC can provide a theoretical model for the analysis of working conditions. He states that the working environment is decisive in shaping the SoC of an individual employee and therefore plays an important role in the formation of health in one’s adult life.

Context-specific sense of coherence
Several authors redefined SoC as a flexible and context-specific construct. Artinian (1997) introduced situational SoC, which is a construct that reflects an individual’s present and specific orientation rather than a global life orientation. Situational SoC was applied in a hospital setting to measure clients’ responses to stressful situations. Antonovsky and Sourani (1988) discuss the construct of family SoC, which describes the perceived coherence of family life. Following the idea of a more specific concept of SoC, Gräser (2003) constructed a 13-item scale measuring university SoC and investigated to what extent university staff perceives their work situation as coherent. The scale has a good reliability and negatively correlates with health-related problems. Gräser (2003) suggests that university SoC can be used to measure the health-promoting quality of a university.

The concept of a work-related sense of coherence
In similar vein, Bauer and Jenny (2007) proposed the concept of a work-related SoC (Work-SoC). To further refine this concept, this article defines Work-SoC as the perceived comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness of an individual’s current work situation. In line with the concept of general SoC (Antonovsky, 1987b), ‘comprehensibility’ describes the extent to which a work situation is perceived as structured, consistent and clear; ‘manageability’ describes the extent to which an employee perceives that adequate resources are available to cope with the demands in the workplace and ‘meaningfulness’ describes the extent to which a situation at work is seen as worthy of commitment and involvement. This perception of comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness is influenced by the interaction between individual characteristics (an employee’s personality and experiences) and the characteristics of the working environment (work-related structures and processes).

This interactional definition of Work-SoC is in line with related interactional concepts such as the conceptualisation of salutogenesis in which the development of SoC is influenced by both stressors and general resistance resources (Antonovsky, 1979), the transactional model of stress (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), the health-development model (Bauer, Davies & Pelikan, 2006) and the person-environment-fit model (Edwards & Shipp, 2007). In addition, the job demands-resources (JD-R) model considers perceived job demands and job resources to be influenced by both personal and organisational factors (Dollard & Bakker, 2010; Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti & Schaufeli, 2007).

Referring to the original conceptualisation of Bauer and Jenny (2007), Eberz, Becker and Antony (2011) re-interpreted work-related sense of coherence as an individual meta-resource that acts as a moderator of the work-health relationship by reducing the potential negative effects of work stressors. Their initial exploratory study with a homogeneous group of 93 pastor’s secretaries indicates that – unlike general SoC – Work-SoC explains incremental variance and appears to be a stronger predictor of work-related stress. The authors further state that the health-promoting effect of social support can be explained by the mediating role of Work-SoC.

Building on the original conceptualisation of Work-SoC as an interactional construct, Vogt, Jenny, Füllemann, Inauen and Bauer (2012) report that a nine-item questionnaire measuring the comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness of work has a good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.83) and that the scale has a three-factor structure with the sub-dimensions of comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness.

The present study
The present study operationalises the interactional concept of Work-SoC as a context-specific construct that is more dynamic and sensitive to changes than general SoC. Work-related sense of coherence might therefore be used as an indicator of the perceived health-promoting quality of an individual’s working conditions. However, if the Work-SoC scale is to be applied in broad employee surveys, it should be determined whether the three-factor structure is invariant across different groups. Furthermore, for the scale to be used in longitudinal analyses, it is also important to establish whether the scale shows factorial invariance across time. Therefore, the following hypothesis was tested:

Hypothesis 1: The correlated three-factor structure of Work-SoC is invariant across groups and time.

Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3 concern the construct validity of the Work-SoC scale. As Work-SoC is defined as the perceived comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness of an individual’s current work situation, it is expected that Work-SoC is related to the health-relevant measures of the current work situation, which are operationalised through job demands and job resources (JD-R), as in the JD-R model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). In relation to that model, it was hypothesised that positively valued work characteristics (e.g. job resources) would be positively related to Work-SoC, that is, the comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness of an individual’s current work situation. Negatively valued work characteristics (e.g. job demands), in contrast, were hypothesised to be negatively related to Work-SoC.

Hypothesis 2: (a) Job resources are related to higher values in Work-SoC, and (b) job demands are related to lower values in Work-SoC.

The relationship between job resources and work engagement and between job demands and exhaustion has been argued in research on the JD-R model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). Based on the finding that SoC partly mediates the relationship between job characteristics and well-being (Albertsen et al., 2001; Feldt et al., 2000, Hogh & Mikkelsen, 2005) and in line with the JD-R model, it was hypothesised that Work-SoC acts as a partial mediator in the relationship between job resources and work engagement as well as between job demands and exhaustion, respectively.

Hypothesis 3: (a) Work-SoC partially mediates the relationship between job resources and work engagement, and secondly, (b) Work-SoC partially mediates the relationship between job demands and exhaustion.

Contrary to the relatively stable general SoC, Work-SoC is expected to vary when work characteristics (e.g. the job demands and job resources) change. It was therefore hypothesised that Work-SoC does not mediate the longitudinal relationship between job resources and work engagement and between job demands and exhaustion.

Hypothesis 3: (c) Work-SoC at baseline does not mediate the relationship between job resources at baseline and work engagement at the first follow-up (longitudinal), and (d) Work-SoC at baseline does not mediate the relationship between job demands at baseline and exhaustion at the first follow-up (longitudinal).

Research design

Research approach
A quantitative data analysis of a large dataset with three measurement points was undertaken to investigate the factorial invariance and the construct validity of the Work-SoC scale.

Research method

Research participants
The present study investigated cross-sectional and longitudinal data collected in eight medium to large Swiss companies. The baseline survey (T1) yielded a sample of 3412 participants (response rate: 68.6%). At the first follow-up after one year (T2), 3085 employees participated in the study (response rate: 60.5%). At the second follow-up after two years (T3), 2395 employees participated in the study (response rate: 48.2%).

The survey contains data from employees working in diverse economic sectors (four industrial-production companies, one food-processing company, one public-administration service and two hospitals) and therefore covers a broad range of different occupational groups (e.g. manufacturing, maintenance, mechanical work, administration, service sector, health professionals and cleaning and kitchen staff). At the baseline survey, the sample consisted of 40.7% females, the average age was 38.9 years (SD = 11.5) and 24.8% of respondents had a leadership position. Furthermore, 78.2% of respondents worked full time, the mean organisational tenure was 8.6 years (SD = 9.3) and the mean job tenure was 5.3 years (SD = 6.6). At the first follow-up, 71.2% of the participants answered the survey in German, 25.5% in French and 3.3% in other languages such as English, Italian, or Serbo-Croatian (no data are available on the language versions of the baseline survey). The participation in the survey was voluntary.

Measuring instruments
Work-related sense of coherence: Work-SoC was assessed using a nine-item scale (see Figure 1). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of .83. Items 1, 3, 6 and 9 measured the sub-dimension of comprehensibility whilst items 4 and 7 measured the sub-dimension of manageability and items 2, 5 and 8 measured the sub-dimension of meaningfulness.

FIGURE 1: The Work-SoC Questionnaire.

Work engagement: Work engagement was assessed using the nine-item version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (Schaufeli, Bakker & Salanova, 2006). This scale measures the underlying dimensions of work engagement, including vigour (e.g. ‘At work, I feel like I am bursting with energy’), dedication (e.g. ‘I am enthusiastic about my job’) and absorption (e.g. ‘I am immersed in my work’). The items were scored on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 (Never) to 6 (Always/every day). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.95.

Exhaustion: Exhaustion was assessed using one dimension of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (Demerouti, 1999). The exhaustion scale contains eight items (e.g. ‘After my work, I usually feel worn out and weary’). The items were scored on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 (Totally disagree) to 4 (Totally agree). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.80.

Job resources: Five job resources that are present across various jobs and organisations were measured. Task identity was assessed by a single item (e.g. ‘In my job, one can produce something or carry out an assignment from A to Z’). The item was scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (almost never/not at all true) to 5 (almost always/fully true) (Udris & Rimann, 1999). Job control was assessed with a six-item scale (e.g. ‘Can you organise your workday autonomously?’). The items were scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (very little/not at all) to 5 (very much) (Semmer, Zapf & Dunckel, 1999). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.87. Social support was assessed using three items. Participants were asked how much they could rely on their direct supervisor, on their closest colleagues and on other colleagues in difficult situations at work. The items were scored on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 (very little/not at all) to 5 (very much) (Frese, 1989). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.70. Appreciation was assessed with two items (e.g. ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your colleagues’ appreciation of you as a person?’ and ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your line manager’s appreciation of you as a person?’). The items were scored on a seven-point graphical scale with smiley faces from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied) (Jacobshagen, Oehler, Stettler, Liechti & Semmer, 2008). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.59. Interpersonal justice was assessed using four items (e.g. ‘To what extent has he or she treated you with respect?’). The items were scored on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 (to a small extent) to 5 (to a large extent) (Colquitt, 2001). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.82.

Job demands: Four job demands that are relevant in a number of work environments were measured. Time pressure (e.g. ‘At work, how often is a rapid pace of work required?’) and work interruption (e.g. ‘How often does it occur that you cannot work on something in peace because something else always comes in between?’) were both assessed with four items that were scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (very rarely/never) to 5 (very often/constantly) (Semmer, Zapf & Dunckel, 1995). The Cronbach alpha for time pressure is 0.82, and the Cronbach alpha for work interruption is 0.83. Qualitative overload was assessed using three items (e.g. ‘It happens that work is too difficult’). The items were scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (almost never/not at all true) to 5 (Almost always/fully true) (Udris & Rimann, 1999). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.77. Uncertainty at work was assessed using four items (e.g. ‘How often do you receive contradictory instructions from different supervisors?’). Three items were rated on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (very rarely/never) to 5 (very often/constantly), and one item was rated on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (from nobody) to 5 (from more than three persons) (Semmer et al., 1995). The scale has a Cronbach alpha of 0.69.

Research procedure
Participants voluntarily filled in an online questionnaire during working hours and were assured of anonymity and the confidentiality of the data. The three measurement points were linked with an anonymous code for each participant.

Statistical analysis
The factorial invariance of Work-SoC across different groups and time (Hypothesis 1) was tested using multiple group analysis (Byrne, 2004; 2010) with the AMOS 20 software package. In this procedure, a fully constrained model (with equality constraints on all factor loadings, factor variances and factor co-variances) was compared to a default model without cross-group constraints. Traditionally, χ2 difference tests are used to assess whether there is a significant difference between the models (Schmitt & Kuljanin, 2008). However, because χ2 is highly dependent on sample size, invariance decisions were based on the difference in the comparative fit index (CFI) and the difference in root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) with a ∆ CFI ≥ 0.01 supplemented by a ∆ RMSEA ≥ 0.015 indicating non-invariance (Chen, 2007; Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).

For the use in the correlation (Hypothesis 2) and regression analyses (Hypothesis 3), factor scores for the job demands and job resources were calculated with the regression method. To test the mediating role of Work-SoC (Hypothesis 3), the SPSS macro provided by Preacher and Hayes (2008) was used.

Results

Invariance tests
The invariance tests of Work-SoC across different groups and across time are presented in Table 1. The results indicate that the scale’s factor structure is invariant across gender, different age groups, employees with lower and higher levels of education and employees with or without a leadership position. Furthermore, the factor structure of Work-SoC is invariant across three measurement points.

TABLE 1: Invariance of Work-SoC across different groups and time.

Relationship between job resources, job demands and the work-related sense of coherence
The cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations of the investigated constructs are presented in Table 2. Job resources were found to be positively correlated to Work-SoC (r = 0.44; p < 0.001), and job demands were found to be negatively correlated to Work-SoC (r = -0.37; p < 0.001).

TABLE 2: Inter-correlations of the studied variables (N = 1233 to 3639).

Work-related sense of coherence as a partial mediator between job resources and work engagement
Table 3 reports the results of the cross-sectional and longitudinal mediation analyses on the relationship between job resources and work engagement. In line with the literature on the JD-R model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007), job resources have a significant effect on work engagement (see Table 3, total effect c). The effect decreases in size but remains significant when Work-SoC is taken into account (effect of job resources c’), which indicates partial mediation. The bootstrapped indirect effect via Work-SoC is significant (B = 0.27). In the longitudinal model, no direct or indirect effect of job resources T1 and Work-SoC T1 on work engagement T2 was found when controlling for work engagement T1.

TABLE 3: Mediation analyses of job resources on work engagement via workrelated sense of coherence.

Work-related sense of coherence as a partial mediator between job demands and exhaustion
Table 4 reports the results of the cross-sectional and longitudinal mediation analyses on the relationship between job demands and exhaustion. A significant cross-sectional effect of job demands on exhaustion (see Table 4, total effect c) was found. The effect decreases in size but remains significant when Work-SoC is taken into account (effect of job demands c’). The bootstrapped indirect effect via Work-SoC was significant (B = 0.07). In the longitudinal model, the total effect of job demands T1 on exhaustion T2 was significant (B = 0.04). No indirect effect of Work-SoC was found in the longitudinal model.

TABLE 4: Mediation analyses of job demands on exhaustion via work-related sense of coherence.

Discussion

This article reported on an investigation into the factorial invariance and the construct validity of a scale measuring Work-SoC. Multiple group analyses indicate that the scale functions equally well across different employee groups and that the scale’s factor structure is invariant across time. High values in job resources are related to high values in Work-SoC whereas high values in job demands are related to low values in Work-SoC. In the cross-sectional analyses, Work-SoC was found to be a partial mediator of the relationship between job resources and work engagement and between job demands and exhaustion. No mediating effect of Work-SoC was found in the longitudinal analyses.

According to Byrne (2004), it is important to assess that a construct has the same theoretical structure for each group studied and to test for multiple group invariance. This study shows that the three-factor structure of Work-SoC reported by Vogt et al. (2012) is invariant across gender, different age groups, employees with lower and higher levels of education, employees with or without leaderships positions and time. These results provide evidence for the robustness of the Work-SoC scale as they suggest that changes or differences in Work-SoC can be attributed to changes or differences in the actual values of Work-SoC but not to changes or differences in the structure or measurement of the construct.

Based on the assumption that job resources and job demands are both related to the comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness of an individual’s current work situation, the hypotheses that job resources are related to higher values in Work-SoC and that job demands are related to lower values in Work-SoC have been tested and found to be true. Therefore, it can be concluded that Work-SoC partly reflects an individual’s job resources and job demands. This is in line with the conceptualisation of Work-SoC as an interactional construct that is partly formed by environmental factors in the workplace.

The mediating effect of Work-SoC is considerably stronger in the process that leads from job resources to work engagement than it is in the process that leads from job demands to exhaustion. This is consistent with the conceptualisation of SoC as a health resource. Its theoretical background in the field of Salutogenesis emphasises the promotion of health, rather than focusing on factors that cause diseases (Antonovsky, 1987b). Therefore, one could conclude that positively valued work characteristics such as task identity, job control and social support affect employee well-being both indirectly through Work-SoC and directly as only partial mediation was found. Given the mediating role of Work-SoC between job resources and work engagement and between job demands and exhaustion, one could further conclude that Work-SoC might indeed serve as an indicator of an individual’s perception of the health-promoting quality of the working situation. In line with expectations, no mediating effect of Work-SoC in the longitudinal data was found. Rather, the effect of the control variable baseline-work engagement on the outcome variable work engagement at the first follow up after one year (or baseline exhaustion on exhaustion at the first follow-up) was so strong that all other effects were diminished.

Limitations of the study and further research
The present study has some limitations that should be considered. As all of the investigated measures were self-reported, common method biases may have influenced our results; therefore, the relationships that were found might be lower if measured differently (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee & Podsakoff, 2003). Furthermore, ‘task identity’ was measured with a single item only. However, as this measure was aggregated to a job-resources factor, this should not pose a major problem regarding the interpretation of the study’s results. As a mediating effect of Work-SoC was found in the cross-sectional data only, no conclusions regarding the causality and direction of this mediation can be drawn. Further, the mechanisms underlying these relationships can only be speculated.

Using Work-SoC as an indicator of the overall quality of working life presupposes that Work-SoC is sensitive to changing working conditions. As proposed by Eberz et al. (2011), further research might investigate whether changes in an individual’s work situation lead to changes in Work-SoC and whether these changes are larger than changes in the general SoC. Longitudinal data with short intervals (e.g. a daily-diary method) might be particularly appropriate for a detailed examination of Work-SoC and its relation to work characteristics and health-related outcomes. This methodology might also provide information on how the Work-SoC of individual employees could be enhanced (Kalimo et al., 2003).

Conclusion
Even with the above-mentioned limitations in mind, the present study has investigated longitudinal data of a large sample and has provided interesting and relevant results concerning the factorial invariance and the construct validity of the Work-SoC scale. General SoC has been studied in a number of South African studies (e.g. Muller & Rothmann, 2009; Van der Colff & Rothmann, 2009), and the present study adds to this discourse by introducing an innovative, context-specific conceptualisation of SoC.

A practical application of Work-SoC might be its use as an economic means of assessing the perception of the potential health-promoting quality of an individual’s current work situation. Work-SoC might be used as a screening instrument to detect the need for further investigation and to derive interventions that enhance the health-promoting quality of working environments. In line with a call for positive health (Seligman, 2008), the construct of Work-SoC emphasises a resource-oriented view on workplace health promotion.

Acknowledgements

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions
K.V. (ETH Zurich) drafted the article and analysed the data. G.J.J. (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) and G.F.B (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) supervised the writing of the article and the statistical analyses. All authors were responsible for the conception and design of the study. Each made significant contributions to the discussion and interpretation of the results and read and approved the final manuscript. G.J.J. (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) and G.F.B (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) were responsible for the collection of data for the study. G.F.B. (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) was responsible for securing funding for the study.

References

Albertsen, K., Nielsen, M.L., & Borg, V. (2001). The Danish psychosocial work environment and symptoms of stress: The main, mediating and moderating role of sense of coherence. Work & Stress, 15, 241–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678370110066562

Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Antonovsky, A. (1987a). Health promoting factors at work: The sense of coherence. In R. Kalimo, M.A. El-Batawi, & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Psychosocial factors at work and their relation to health (pp. 153–167). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Antonovsky, A. (1987b). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Antonovsky, A., & Sourani, T. (1988). Family sense of coherence and family adaptation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352429

Artinian, B.M. (1997). Situational sense of coherence: Development and measurement of the construct. In B.M. Artinian & M.M. Conger (Eds.), The intersystem model: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 18–30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bauer, G., Davies, J.K., & Pelikan, J. (2006). The EUHPID health development model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promotion International, 21, 153–159.

Bauer, G., & Jenny, G. (2007). Development, implementation and dissemination of occupational health management (OHM): Putting salutogenesis into practice. In S. McIntyre & J. Houdmont (Eds.), Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice (pp. 219–250). Castelo da Maia, Portugal: ISMAI.

Byrne, B.M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8

Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.

Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.386

Demerouti, E. (1999). Burnout: Eine Folge konkreter Arbeitsbedingungen bei Dienstleistungs- und Produktionstätigkeiten. Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.

Dollard, M.F., & Bakker, A.B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 579–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690

Eberz, S., Becker, R., & Antoni, C.H. (2011). Kohärenzerleben im Arbeitskontext: Ein nützliches Konstrukt für die ABO-Psychologie? [Work-related sense of coherence – A useful construct for occupational psychology?]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 55, 115–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000056

Edwards, J.R., & Shipp, A.J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff & T.A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 209–258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 376–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041616

Feldt, T. (1997). The role of sense of coherence in well-being at work: Analysis of main and moderator effects. Work & Stress, 11, 134–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678379708256830

Feldt, T., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (2000). A mediational model of sense of coherence in the work context: A 1–year follow-up study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 461–476.

Feldt, T., Kivimäki, M., Rantala, A., & Tolvanen, A. (2004). Sense of coherence and work characteristics: A cross-lagged structural equation model among managers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 323–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0963179041752655

Frese, M. (1989). Gütekriterien zur Operationalisierung von sozialer Unterstützung am Arbeitsplatz [Criteria for operationalisation of social support at the workplace]. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaften, 43, 112–121.

Gräser, S. (2003). Hochschule und Gesundheit: Salutogenese am Arbeitsplatz Universität. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.

Hogh, A., & Mikkelsen, E.G. (2005). Is sense of coherence a mediator or moderator of relationships between violence at work and stress reactions? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 429–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00474.x

Jacobshagen, N., Oehler, N., Stettler, E., Liechti, S., & Semmer, N.K. (2008, November). Appreciation at work: Measurement and associations with well-being. Poster presented at the 8th Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, Valencia, Spain.

Kalimo, R., Pahkin, K., Mutanen, P., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2003). Staying well or burning out at work: Work characteristics and personal resources as long-term predictors. Work & Stress, 17, 109–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267837031000149919

Kinman, G. (2008). Work stressors, health and sense of coherence in UK academic employees. Educational Psychology, 28, 823–835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410802366298

Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.

Muller, Y., & Rothmann, S. (2009). Sense of coherence and employees’ perceptions of helping and restraining factors in an organisation. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), 10 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v35i1.731

Pahkin, K., Väänänen, A., Koskinen, A., Bergbom, B., & Kouvonen, A. (2011). Organizational change and employees› mental health: The protective role of sense of coherence. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 118–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318206f0cb

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003

Seligman, M.E.P. (2008). Positive health. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00351.x

Semmer, N.K., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1995). Assessing stress at work: A framework and an instrument. In O. Svane & C. Johansen (Eds.), Work and health: Scientific basis of progress in the working environment (pp. 105–113). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Semmer, N.K., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1999). Instrument zur stressbezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse: ISTA. In H. Dunckel (Ed.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren: Ein praxisorientierter Überblick (pp. 179–204). Zurich, Switzerland: vdf Hochschulverlag

Udris, I., & Rimann, M. (1999). SAA und SALSA: Zwei Fragebögen zur subjektiven Arbeitsanalyse. In H. Dunckel (Ed.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren. Ein praxisorientierter Überblick (pp. 397–419). Zurich, Switzerland: vdf Hochschulverlag.

Van der Colff, J.J., & Rothmann, S. (2009). Occupational stress, sense of coherence, coping, burnout and work engagement of registered nurses in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), 10 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v35i1.423

Vogt, K., Jenny, G.J., Füllemann, D., Inauen, A., & Bauer, G.F. (2012, August). Work-related sense of coherence as a higher-order indicator of salutogenic working conditions. Paper presented at Health Promotion Research - An International Forum, Trondheim, Norway.

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121


 

Crossref Citations

1. Investigating self-rated health and wellbeing among teachers in Finland from a salutogenic perspective
Stina F. Lähteenmäki, Lisbeth M. Fagerström, Anna K. Forsman
Psychology, Society & Education  vol: 16  issue: 3  first page: 31  year: 2024  
doi: 10.21071/pse.v16i3.17096

2. Self-Management Support for Cancer Survivors: A Descriptive Evaluation of the Symptom Navi Training from the Perspective of Health Care Professionals
Marika Bana, Selma Riedo, Karin Ribi
Current Oncology  vol: 32  issue: 6  first page: 326  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060326

3. Bouncing Beyond Adversity in Oncology: An Exploratory Study of the Association Between Professional Team Resilience at Work and Work-Related Sense of Coherence
Dominique Tremblay, Djamal Berbiche, Mathieu Roy, Catherine Prady, Marie-José Durand, Marjolaine Landry, Sylvie Lessard
Current Oncology  vol: 31  issue: 11  first page: 7287  year: 2024  
doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110537

4. Wider psychische Belastungen – resilientes Arbeiten in der Chirurgie
Beatrice Thielmann, Frank Meyer, Irina Böckelmann
Die Chirurgie  vol: 95  issue: 2  first page: 135  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01977-9

5. Health literacy and mental well-being of school staff in times of crisis: A path analysis of sense of coherence, work-related stress, and health-protective behaviours
Padmore Adusei Amoah, Angela Y.M. Leung, Joshua Okyere, Sam S.S. Lau, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan
Public Health  vol: 245  first page: 105749  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105749

6. Does affective organizational commitment and experience of meaning at work predict risk of disability pensioning? An analysis of register‐based outcomes using pooled data on 40,554 observations in four occupational groups
Thomas Clausen, Hermann Burr, Vilhelm Borg
American Journal of Industrial Medicine  vol: 57  issue: 6  first page: 709  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22313

7. Job crafting and motivation to continue working beyond retirement age
Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler, Andrea Fischbach
Career Development International  vol: 21  issue: 5  first page: 477  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0009

8. The Importance of Intergenerational Leadership Praxes and Availability of Key Information for Older Employee Burnout and Engagement in the Context of Firm Size
Maja Rožman, Borut Milfelner
Frontiers in Psychology  vol: 13  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858134

9. How Conditions and Resources Connected to Digital Management Systems and Remote Work Are Associated with Sustainable Work
Andrea Eriksson, Lotta Dellve, Anna Williamsson, Katrin Skagert
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 23  first page: 15731  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315731

10. Resilience at Work among Healthcare Professionals in Oncology during and beyond the Pandemic: Report from A Deliberative Multi-Stakeholder Reflexive Symposium
Dominique Tremblay, Sophie Beaupère, Julien Biaudet, Patrick Castel, Béatrice Fervers, Christelle Galvez, Pascale Sontag, Susan Usher, Catherine Wilhelmy
Current Oncology  vol: 30  issue: 7  first page: 6986  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070506

11. Stakeholder views on work participation for workers with depression and intersectoral collaboration in depression care: a focus group study with a salutogenic perspective
Heidi Marie Meling, Norman Anderssen, Sabine Ruths, Stefán Hjörleifsson, Inger Haukenes
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care  vol: 41  issue: 3  first page: 204  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2238019

12. Exploring factors related to special needs educators’ work-related well-being in preschool settings
Veronica Semelius Granevald
European Journal of Special Needs Education  vol: 40  issue: 4  first page: 739  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/08856257.2024.2421111

13. Health-Promoting Quality of Life at Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study on the Work-Related Sense of Coherence in Acute Care Healthcare Professionals
Joana Berger-Estilita, Sandra Abegglen, Nadja Hornburg, Robert Greif, Alexander Fuchs
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 10  first page: 6053  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106053

14. Affective organizational commitment among nursing home employees: A longitudinal study on the influence of a health‐promoting work environment
Karoline Grødal, Siw Tone Innstrand, Gørill Haugan, Beate André
Nursing Open  vol: 6  issue: 4  first page: 1414  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1002/nop2.338

15. Like a fire brigade, but without pay - Experiences of temporary employment among workers in Swedish elder care
B. Wiitavaara, A. Strömberg, J-C. Mutiganda, M. Svensson, D.M. Hallman, S. Svensson
Geriatric Nursing  vol: 60  first page: 281  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.09.012

16. Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in School Principals: Impacts of Gender, Well-Being, and Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy
Tuyen Van Duong, Cheng-Yu Lin, Sheng-Chih Chen, Yung-Kai Huang, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski, Chih-Feng Lai
Vaccines  vol: 9  issue: 9  first page: 985  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9090985

17. Development and Psychometric Test of the Salutogenic Survey on Sustainable Working Life for Nurses: Identifying Resistance Resources against Stress
Monica Eriksson, Elias Johannesson, Nóra Kerekes, Maria Emilsson, Sandra Pennbrant, Håkan Nunstedt
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 21  issue: 2  first page: 198  year: 2024  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020198

18. Salutogenesis at Work as a Facilitator for Implementation? An Explorative Study on the Relationship of Job Demands, Job Resources and the Work-Related Sense of Coherence within a Complex Healthcare Programme
Natalia Cecon, Theresia Krieger, Sandra Salm, Holger Pfaff, Antje Dresen
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 3  first page: 1842  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031842

19. Validation of the Norwegian version of the work-related sense of coherence scale
Karoline Grødal, Siw Tone Innstrand, Georg F. Bauer, Gørill Haugan, Toril Rannestad, Beate André
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health  vol: 46  issue: 7  first page: 711  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1177/1403494817725466

20. Teacher stress and burnout: The role of psychological work resources and implications for practitioners
Lisa L. Brady, Sara C. McDaniel, Youn‐Jeng Choi
Psychology in the Schools  vol: 60  issue: 6  first page: 1706  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1002/pits.22805

21. A Cross-Sectional Study of the Perceived Stress, Well-Being and Their Relations with Work-Related Behaviours among Hong Kong School Leaders during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Sam Lau, Eric Shum, Jackie Man, Ethan Cheung, Padmore Amoah, Angela Leung, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 23  first page: 15777  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315777

22. Sense of coherence mediates the relationship between digital health literacy and anxiety about the future in aging population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a path analysis
Angela Yee Man Leung, Laurence Lloyd Parial, Ma. Carmen Tolabing, Timothy Sim, Phoenix Mo, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski
Aging & Mental Health  vol: 26  issue: 3  first page: 544  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1870206

23. We could help them in many ways. Health coaches’ experiences from targeted health dialogues with 70-year-olds: a qualitative study
Emelie Stenman, Kristina Sundquist, Annika Brorsson
Discover Health Systems  vol: 3  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s44250-024-00074-w

24. Sense of coherence and technological adaptation during the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Sanele B.C. Khanyile, Claude-Hélène Mayer
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology  vol: 51  year: 2025  
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v51i0.2310

25. Work-related Sense of Coherence Scale: Reliability and validity of scores in a South African sample
Sanet van der Westhuizen, Elsie Ramasodi
Journal of Psychology in Africa  vol: 26  issue: 3  first page: 216  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1080/14330237.2016.1185897

26. Gender differences in sense of coherence among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey
Ilker Kayi, Gizem Uzunköprü, Kevin Dadaczynski, Pınar Soylar, Buğra Otludil, Pınar Dündar, Nadi Bakırcı, Orkan Okan, Sibel Sakarya
Health Promotion International  vol: 38  issue: 3  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad048

27. Building resilience in oncology teams: Protocol for a realist evaluation of multiple cases
Dominique Tremblay, Nassera Touati, Kelley Kilpatrick, Marie-José Durand, Annie Turcotte, Catherine Prady, Thomas G. Poder, Patrick O. Richard, Sara Soldera, Djamal Berbiche, Mélissa Généreux, Mathieu Roy, Brigitte Laflamme, Sylvie Lessard, Marjolaine Landry, Émilie Giordano, Marianne Clemence
PLOS ONE  vol: 17  issue: 5  first page: e0268393  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268393

28. Validity and reliability of the Polish adaptation of the work-related sense of coherence scale
Arkadiusz M. Jasiński, Romuald Derbis, Magdalena Wrzesińska, Martin Tušl, Georg F. Bauer
BMC Psychology  vol: 12  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02175-w

29. Relationships between COVID-related health literacy, mental health and workload of school leaders
Rune Müller Kristensen, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Venka Simovska
Health Education Journal  vol: 83  issue: 1  first page: 14  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1177/00178969231211853

30. Subjective social status and well-being of adolescents and young adults in Ghanaian schools: conditional process analysis
Frank Quansah, Edmond Kwesi Agormedah, John Elvis Hagan, James Boadu Frimpong, Francis Ankomah, Medina Srem-Sai, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Thomas Schack
BMC Psychology  vol: 11  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01158-7

31. COVID-19 and Health Information Seeking Behavior: Digital Health Literacy Survey amongst University Students in Pakistan
Rubeena Zakar, Sarosh Iqbal, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Florian Fischer
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 18  issue: 8  first page: 4009  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084009

32. Mental Health, Work Engagement and Meaningful Work-Role Fit of Industrial Psychologists: A Latent Profile Analysis
Llewellyn Ellardus van Zyl, Sebastiaan Rothmann, Carmine Nieman
Psychological Studies  vol: 65  issue: 2  first page: 199  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1007/s12646-019-00544-9

33. A cross-sectional study of university students' wellbeing: What to focus on?
Valentina Biscaldi, Stefano Delbosq, Michela Ghelfi, Jessica Serio, Luca Piero Vecchio, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Veronica Velasco
PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE  issue: 3  first page: 105  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3280/PDS2023-003006

34. Public Health Residents’ Anonymous Survey in Italy (PHRASI): Study Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study for a Multidimensional Assessment of Mental Health and Its Determinants
Alessandro Catalini, Clara Mazza, Claudia Cosma, Giuseppa Minutolo, Valentina De Nicolò, Veronica Gallinoro, Marta Caminiti, Angela Ancona, Lorenzo Stacchini, Nausicaa Berselli, Eleonora Ferrari, Fabrizio Cedrone, Vincenza Gianfredi
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 20  issue: 3  first page: 2003  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032003

35. The well-being and work-related stress of senior school leaders in Wales and Northern Ireland during COVID-19 “educational leadership crisis”: A cross-sectional descriptive study
Emily Marchant, Joanna Dowd, Lucy Bray, Gill Rowlands, Nia Miles, Tom Crick, Michaela James, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Ali B. Mahmoud
PLOS ONE  vol: 19  issue: 4  first page: e0291278  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291278

36. Sustainable Employability of People with Limited Capability for Work: The Participatory Development and Validation of a Questionnaire
S. R. Hiemstra, B. P. I. Fleuren, A. de Jonge, J. Naaldenberg, L. Vaandrager
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation  vol: 35  issue: 1  first page: 105  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10191-1

37. Digital Health Literacy Related to COVID-19: Validation and Implementation of a Questionnaire in Hispanic University Students
María F. Rivadeneira, María J. Miranda-Velasco, Hiram V. Arroyo, José D. Caicedo-Gallardo, Carmen Salvador-Pinos
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 7  first page: 4092  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074092

38. Salutogenesis for thriving nations: Sense of coherence and longevity across income strata
Naeimah Alkharafi
SSM - Population Health  vol: 31  first page: 101839  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101839

39. Personal factors and career adaptability in a call centre work environment: The mediating effects of professional efficacy
Nisha Harry
Journal of Psychology in Africa  vol: 27  issue: 4  first page: 356  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1080/14330237.2017.1347758

40. Sense of Coherence: Notes on Some Challenges for Future Research
Jacek Hochwälder
Sage Open  vol: 9  issue: 2  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1177/2158244019846687

41. Implementation of the Symptom Navi © Programme for cancer patients in the Swiss outpatient setting: a study protocol for a cluster randomised pilot study (Symptom Navi© Pilot Study)
Marika Bana, Karin Ribi, Susanne Kropf-Staub, Sabin Zürcher-Florin, Ernst Näf, Tanja Manser, Lukas Bütikofer, Felix Rintelen, Solange Peters, Manuela Eicher
BMJ Open  vol: 9  issue: 7  first page: e027942  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027942

42. The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies
Tino Lesener, Burkhard Gusy, Christine Wolter
Work & Stress  vol: 33  issue: 1  first page: 76  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065

43. Predictors of well-being, future anxiety, and multiple recurrent health complaints among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of socioeconomic determinants, sense of coherence, and digital health literacy. An Italian cross-sectional study
Chiara Lorini, Giuseppe Cavallo, Virginia Vettori, Primo Buscemi, Giulia Ciardi, Patrizio Zanobini, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski, Vieri Lastrucci, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
Frontiers in Public Health  vol: 11  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1210327

44. Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
Sandra Salm, Stefanie Houwaart, Natalia Cecon-Stabel, Antje Dresen, Holger Pfaff, Nadine Scholten, Theresia Krieger
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology  vol: 149  issue: 12  first page: 10399  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4

45. Workload Is Associated with Anxiety and Insomnia Symptoms in an Italian Nationally Representative Sample of Public Health Medical Residents: The PHRASI Cross-Sectional Study
Alessandro Catalini, Lorenzo Stacchini, Giuseppa Minutolo, Angela Ancona, Marta Caminiti, Claudia Cosma, Veronica Gallinoro, Valentina De Nicolò, Fabrizio Cedrone, Pamela Barbadoro, Vincenza Gianfredi
Healthcare  vol: 12  issue: 22  first page: 2299  year: 2024  
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12222299

46. A Work Environment Under Pressure: Psychosocial Job Demands and Resources Among Saturation Divers
Siri Romsbotn, Ingrid Eftedal, Jonas Rennemo Vaag
Frontiers in Public Health  vol: 10  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.765197

47. Exploring sense of coherence (SOC) in relation to working conditions for employees with hearing loss
Sara Båsjö, Johanna Gustafsson, Sarah Granberg
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1177/10519815251349523

48. Development and use of research vignettes to collect qualitative data from healthcare professionals: a scoping review
Dominique Tremblay, Annie Turcotte, Nassera Touati, Thomas G Poder, Kelley Kilpatrick, Karine Bilodeau, Mathieu Roy, Patrick O Richard, Sylvie Lessard, Émilie Giordano
BMJ Open  vol: 12  issue: 1  first page: e057095  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057095

49. Effects of Interventions to Prevent Work-Related Asthma, Allergy, and Other Hypersensitivity Reactions in Norwegian Salmon Industry Workers (SHInE): Protocol for a Pragmatic Allocated Intervention Trial and Related Substudies
Anje Christina Höper, Jorunn Kirkeleit, Marte Renate Thomassen, Kaja Irgens-Hansen, Bjørg Eli Hollund, Carl Fredrik Fagernæs, Sindre Rabben Svedahl, Thor Eirik Eriksen, Miriam Grgic, Berit Elisabeth Bang
JMIR Research Protocols  vol: 12  first page: e48790  year: 2023  
doi: 10.2196/48790

50. Educator burnout in the age of COVID-19: A mediation analysis of perceived stressors, work sense of coherence, and sociodemographic characteristics
Sara C. McDaniel, Duhita Mahatmya, Allison L. Bruhn
Teaching and Teacher Education  vol: 137  first page: 104384  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104384

51. Effects of Gender and Age Interaction on Sense of Coherence and Subjective Well-Being of Senior High School Students in Northern Ghana
Edmond Kwesi Agormedah, Francis Ankomah, Medina Srem-Sai, Regina Mawusi Nugba, Frank Quansah, John Elvis Hagan, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski, Thomas Schack
Education Sciences  vol: 14  issue: 2  first page: 178  year: 2024  
doi: 10.3390/educsci14020178

52. Exploring how intervention characteristics affect implementability: A mixed methods case study of common elements-based academic support in child welfare services
Thomas Engell, Anne Marte Løvstad, Benedicte Kirkøen, Terje Ogden, Kristine Amlund Hagen
Children and Youth Services Review  vol: 129  first page: 106180  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106180

53. Effects of a Mindfulness Intervention Comprising an App, Web-Based Workshops, and a Workbook on Perceived Stress Among Nurses and Nursing Trainees: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Simone Schönfeld, Ines Rathmer, Maren M Michaelsen, Cosima Hoetger, Miriam Onescheit, Silke Lange, Lena Werdecker, Tobias Esch
JMIR Research Protocols  vol: 11  issue: 8  first page: e37195  year: 2022  
doi: 10.2196/37195

54. Work-SoC–Entwicklung und Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung des arbeitsbezogenen Kohärenzgefühls
Georg F. Bauer, Katharina Vogt, Alice Inauen, Gregor J. Jenny
Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie  vol: 23  issue: 1  first page: 20  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1026/0943-8149/a000132

55. Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress along with Coping Strategy and Work-related Sense of Coherence in Anesthesia Care Providers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study
Meghna Jiwanmall, Jerry Joseph Joel, Aparna Williams, Stephen Amarjeet Jiwanmall, Bharath Kumar, Ekta Rai
Current Medical Issues  vol: 22  issue: 2  first page: 87  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4103/cmi.cmi_4_24

56. The Context, Process, and Outcome Evaluation Model for Organisational Health Interventions
Annemarie Fridrich, Gregor J. Jenny, Georg F. Bauer
BioMed Research International  vol: 2015  first page: 1  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1155/2015/414832

57. Teachers’ Well-Being and Associated Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong, China
Sam Lau, Eric Shum, Jackie Man, Ethan Cheung, Padmore Amoah, Angela Leung, Orkan Okan, Kevin Dadaczynski
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 22  first page: 14661  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214661

58. Student Learning Experiences and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic at the University of Free State
Semira Pillay, Lise Kriel, Frank Magaya
Progressio  year: 2024  
doi: 10.25159/2663-5895/14212

59. Incremental validity of work-related sense of coherence in predicting work wellness
Sanet C. Van der Westhuizen
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology  vol: 44  year: 2018  
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1467

60. The relationship between resourceful working conditions, work-related and general sense of coherence
Sylvia Broetje, Georg F Bauer, Gregor J Jenny
Health Promotion International  vol: 35  issue: 5  first page: 1168  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz112

61. An employee-centered perspective on business processes: measuring “healthy business processes” and their relationships with people and performance outcomes
Julia A.M. Reif, Katharina G. Kugler, Mariella T. Stockkamp, Selina S. Richter, Valerie M. Benning, Lina A. Muschaweck, Felix C. Brodbeck
Business Process Management Journal  vol: 28  issue: 2  first page: 398  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2021-0375

62. Distress and resilience of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic (DARVID): study protocol for a mixed-methods research project
Alexander Fuchs, Sandra Abegglen, Joana Berger-Estilita, Robert Greif, Helen Eigenmann
BMJ Open  vol: 10  issue: 7  first page: e039832  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039832

63. Managing adversity: a cross-sectional exploration of resilience in social care
Anita Mallon, Gary Mitchell, Gillian Carter, Derek F. McLaughlin, Corrina Grimes, Christine Brown Wilson
BMC Geriatrics  vol: 25  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06306-9

64. COVID-19-related fear, stress and depression in school principals: impacts of symptoms like COVID-19, information confusion, health-related activity limitations, working hours, sense of coherence and health literacy
Tuyen Van Duong, Minh H. Nguyen, Chih-Feng Lai, Sheng-Chih Chen, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Cheng-Yu Lin
Annals of Medicine  vol: 54  issue: 1  first page: 2064  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2101688

65. Chatbots and robots: a framework for the self-management of occupational stress
Akihiro Yorita, Simon Egerton, Carina Chan, Naoyuki Kubota
ROBOMECH Journal  vol: 10  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1186/s40648-023-00261-z

66. Salutogenic mechanisms in nature-based work: fostering sense of coherence for employees with limited capability for work
Sanne Renske Hiemstra, Jenneken Naaldenberg, A de Jonge, Lenneke Vaandrager
Health Promotion International  vol: 39  issue: 5  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae127

67. MEANWELL: Meaningful work as a source of well-being : Research and development project description
Sanna Markkula, Sanna Konsti, Johanna Rantanen
JYU Reports  first page: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.17011/jyureports/2024/40

68. Healthy business processes: How a coherent work environment enhances employee well-being
Selina S. Richter, Julia A. M. Reif, Erika Spieß, Rita Berger
Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO)  vol: 56  issue: 3  first page: 441  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s11612-025-00827-y

69. ‘I am not forced to live near the office’: sustainable hybrid work for public employees in a rural region
Michaela Tjernberg, Charlotta Faith-Ell, Marie-France Champoux-Larsson
Cogent Psychology  vol: 12  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/23311908.2025.2498217

70. Work-related well-being in a call centre environment: The moderating role of age and tenure
Sanet van der Westhuizen, Liezel Bezuidenhout
Journal of Psychology in Africa  vol: 27  issue: 3  first page: 216  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1080/14330237.2017.1321827

71. Psychological Wellbeing and Academic Experience of University Students in Australia during COVID-19
Rachael H. Dodd, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Kristen Pickles
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  vol: 18  issue: 3  first page: 866  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030866

72. University students’ sense of coherence, future worries and mental health: findings from the German COVID-HL-survey
Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Melanie Messer, Katharina Rathmann
Health Promotion International  vol: 37  issue: 1  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab070