Original Research

The validation of a workplace incivility scale within the South African banking industry

Olivia Smidt, Leon T. de Beer, Lizelle Brink, Michael P. Leiter
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 42, No 1 | a1316 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1316 | © 2016 Olivia Smidt, Leon T. de Beer, Lizelle Brink, Michael P. Leiter | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 October 2015 | Published: 05 May 2016

About the author(s)

Olivia Smidt, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Leon T. de Beer, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Lizelle Brink, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Michael P. Leiter, Centre for Organizational Research & Development, Acadia University, Canada

Abstract

Orientation: Workplace incivility holds consequences for both individuals and organisations. Managers are becoming increasingly aware of this phenomenon. Currently, there is no workplace incivility scale validated for use within the South African context.

Research purpose: To investigate the reliability and validity of the adapted workplace incivility scale by Leiter and colleagues for use within South Africa.

Motivation for the study: As it is currently difficult to measure workplace incivility within the South African context because of the lack of a valid and reliable scale, it is necessary to validate such a scale.

Research design, approach and method: A cross-sectional research approach was used for the study. Convenience sampling (N = 345) was used within the South African banking industry. Specifically, the factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity and predictive validity were investigated in order to establish the overall validity of the scale.

Main findings: The results confirmed that the scale showed a three-factor structure as bestfitting with acceptable reliability coefficients. Furthermore, discriminant validity could be shown between workplace incivility and workplace bullying, that is, supporting that these two constructs are not the same phenomenon. In terms of relationships, colleague incivility did not significantly predict any of the outcome variables and instigated incivility only being a negative predictor of job satisfaction and a borderline statistically significant negative predictor of work engagement. However, supervisor incivility predicted all the outcomes negatively.

Practical/Managerial implications: Based on the results, workplace incivility should be addressed because of the harmful effects it can have, not only on employees but also on organisations. It is therefore necessary for managers to create awareness of workplace incivility in order to ensure that it does not integrate within the organisational culture and affect individual and organisational performance.

Contribution/Value-add: The study contributes to the limited research available in South Africa regarding workplace incivility by providing a scale that is valid and reliable.


Keywords

Validation, workplace incivility, workplace bullying, work engagement, organisational commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intention, South Africa, banking industry

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8156
Total article views: 13100

 

Crossref Citations

1. Can non-profit employees’ internal desires to work be quantified? Validating the Intrinsic Work Motivation Scale
Michelle Renard, Robin John Snelgar
South African Journal of Psychology  vol: 48  issue: 1  first page: 48  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1177/0081246317704125

2. The Impact of (In)Civility on Selected Individual and Organisational Outcomes in Financial Services
Savina Harrilall, Leon T. De Beer
SA Journal of Human Resource Management  vol: 22  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/SAJHRM.v22i0.2752

3. Organizational ethics and workplace incivility: the mediating effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles
Kwasi Dartey-Baah, Samuel Howard Quartey, Maxwell Tabi Wilberforce
Leadership & Organization Development Journal  vol: 45  issue: 5  first page: 792  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1108/LODJ-07-2023-0363

4. Workplace Incivility and Employee Performance: Does Trust in Supervisors Matter? (A Dual Theory Perspective)
Farida Saleem, Muhammad Imran Malik, Iqra Asif, Awais Qasim
Behavioral Sciences  vol: 12  issue: 12  first page: 513  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/bs12120513

5. Psychometric Properties and Measurement Equivalence of the Workplace Incivility Scale Across Cultures: Insights from Daily Diary Study
Mujahid Iqbal, Maryum Bibi, Yu Yan, Shuai Yuan, Sumaira Mubarik
Psychological Reports  vol: 129  issue: 4  first page: 3538  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1177/00332941241293669

6. The role of incivility aggression on decent work: A local government sector case
Vigeline Y. Ngwimba, Willie Chinyamurindi, Mtutuzeli Dywili
Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation  vol: 5  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/JOLGRI.v5i0.197

7. Understanding employee thriving: the role of workplace context, personality and individual resources
Muhammad Nawaz, Ghulam Abid, Bindu Arya, Ghulam Abbas Bhatti, Saira Farooqi
Total Quality Management & Business Excellence  vol: 31  issue: 11-12  first page: 1345  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1482209

8. Organizational Context on Workplace Incivility and Turnover Intention
Dwi Novitasari, Asri Laksmi Riani, Joko Suyono, Mugi Harsono
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS  vol: 17  first page: 387  year: 2020  
doi: 10.37394/23207.2020.17.38

9. Does gender moderates the relationship between favoritism/nepotism, supervisor incivility, cynicism and workplace withdrawal: A neural network and SEM approach
A. Mohammed Abubakar, Boshra Hejraty Namin, Ibrahim Harazneh, Huseyin Arasli, Tuğba Tunç
Tourism Management Perspectives  vol: 23  first page: 129  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.06.001