Original Research

The psychometric properties of a workplace boredom scale (DUBS) within the South African context

Sumarie M. van Wyk, Leon T. de Beer, Jaco Pienaar, Wilmar B. Schaufeli
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 42, No 1 | a1326 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1326 | © 2016 Sumarie M. van Wyk, Leon T. de Beer, Jaco Pienaar, Wilmar B. Schaufeli | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 08 November 2015 | Published: 13 May 2016

About the author(s)

Sumarie M. van Wyk, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Leon T. de Beer, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Jaco Pienaar, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Research Unit Occupational & Organizational Psychology and Professional Learning, KU Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Orientation: Boredom at work has been shown to be a concern for individuals and organisations. At the time of this research, no validated scale was available to measure and investigate workplace boredom within the South African context.

Research purpose: To determine the psychometric properties of the Dutch Boredom Scale (DUBS) within the South African context. Motivation for the study: No reliable and valid scale for workplace boredom was available in South Africa at the time of the current research. Boredom at work has been found to affect organisations negatively in other countries. Insights are needed into workplace boredom and how it affects the outcomes of organisations in South Africa.

Research design, approach and method: A cross-sectional research approach was utilised. A random convenience sample (N = 490) was obtained from organisations within the manufacturing and logistics sector. In order to validate the DUBS, the factor structure, construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) and scale reliability were investigated. A mediation model was also tested with structural equation modelling to ascertain predictive validity.

Main findings: The results showed that the one-factor structure of the DUBS could be confirmed and that this factor had acceptable reliability. In terms of convergent validity, all of the item indicators loaded significantly on the workplace boredom construct, and the relationship between workplace boredom and work underload revealed that they were positively correlated with medium effect size. Furthermore, work engagement and organisational commitment were correlated negatively in terms of practical significance with workplace boredom. A structural mediation model showed that work underload was significantly and positively associated with boredom, which in turn had significant negative relations to both work engagement and organisational commitment. No significant direct relations were found from work underload to either work engagement or organisational commitment. Instead, bootstrapping showed that there was an indirect-only relationship from work underload to work engagement and organisational commitment through workplace boredom – indicating full mediation.

Practical/managerial implications: Management should not neglect workplace boredom, as results indicate that it may adversely impact work engagement and organisational commitment. Therefore, workplace boredom should be a concern not only for individuals, but also for the organisation at large.

Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to the limited research available on workplace boredom in South Africa by providing evidence of acceptable psychometric properties for a workplace boredom scale.


Keywords

Workplace boredom, boredom, psychometric properties, validation, reliability, work engagement, organisational commitment, South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 9163
Total article views: 10550

 

Crossref Citations

1. Safety through engaged workers: The link between Safety-II and work engagement
Franziska Homann, Caroline Limbert, Nicholas Bell, Peter Sykes
Safety Science  vol: 146  first page: 105521  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105521

2. Work-related well-being in early career: A role of self-compassion
Kristýna Krejčová, Igor Krejčí, Hana Chýlová, Pavla Rymešová, Pavel Michálek
Heliyon  vol: 11  issue: 1  first page: e41377  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41377

3. Time Flies When You’re Watching the Skies? Investigating Boredom in Aviation
Maximilian Peukert, Florian Ott, Lea-Sophie Vink
Transportation Research Procedia  vol: 88  first page: 81  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2025.05.010

4. Boredom and engagement at work: do they have different antecedents and consequences?
Michiko KAWADA, Akihito SHIMAZU, Daisuke MIYANAKA, Masahito TOKITA, Keiko SAKAKIBARA, Naana MORI, Fuad HAMSYAH, Lin YUHENG, Kojiro SHOJIMA, Wilmar B. SCHAUFELI
Industrial Health  vol: 62  issue: 2  first page: 110  year: 2024  
doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0028

5. Bored, angry, and overqualified? The high- and low-intensity pathways linking perceived overqualification to behavioural outcomes
Stephanie Andel, Shani Pindek, Maryana L. Arvan
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology  vol: 31  issue: 1  first page: 47  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2021.1919624

6. Clarifying the inconsistently observed curvilinear relationship between workload and employee attitudes and mental well-being
Shani Pindek, Winny Shen, Cheryl E. Gray, Paul E. Spector
Work & Stress  vol: 37  issue: 2  first page: 195  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/02678373.2022.2120562

7. Dutch Boredom Scale
Jonathan Peñalver, Esther Villajos, Amalia Raquel Pérez-Nebra
Occupational Medicine  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqag009

8. Le management à distance est-il un remède à l’ennui du télétravail ? Une étude exploratoire auprès de « néo-télétravailleurs »
Alice Monnier, Clara Laborie, Emmanuel Abord de Chatillon, Alain Lacroux, Christelle Martin-Lacroux
Revue de gestion des ressources humaines  vol: N° 129  issue: 3  first page: 3  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3917/grhu.129.0003

9. The role of individual characteristics and working conditions in understanding boredom at work
Cecilia Toscanelli, Shagini Udayar, Ieva Urbanaviciute, Koorosh Massoudi
Personnel Review  vol: 51  issue: 2  first page: 480  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1108/PR-07-2020-0510

10. Analysis of the Determinants of Work-Life Balance (WLB) on Transportation Employees in China
Ying Meng, Kim Mee Chong, Tze Horng Tan, Ratneswary Rasiah
Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal  vol: 8  issue: 26  first page: 437  year: 2023  
doi: 10.21834/e-bpj.v8i26.5169

11. Predictores del agotamiento laboral por aburrimiento laboral en una muestra de trabajadores de la industria bancaria de Puerto Rico
Jesús M. Cruz Santiago, Abner Vélez Vega, Rita A. Vélez Alvarado
Informes psicológicos  vol: 20  issue: 1  first page: 167  year: 2020  
doi: 10.18566/infpsic.v20n1a11

12. Cuando el trabajo aburre: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Aburrimiento Laboral (EAL)
Miguel Martínez Lugo, Ramón Rodríguez-Montalbán
Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional  vol: 35  issue: 1  first page: 7  year: 2017  
doi: 10.21772/ripo.v35n1a01

13. Síndrome de Boredom en empresarios familiares del ramo automotriz
Carlos Jesús González Macías, Diego Adiel Sandoval Chávez, Ulises Mendoza Arvizo, Jesús Alberto Urrutia de la Garza
Revista Venezolana de Gerencia  vol: 28  issue: 104  first page: 1627  year: 2023  
doi: 10.52080/rvgluz.28.104.15

14. The Power of Place: The Impact of Real Estate on Work Success When Working From Home
Yassien Bachtal, Kyra Voll, Felix Gauger, Andreas Pfnür
German Journal of Real Estate Research  vol: 11  issue: 1  first page: 3  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3790/gjrer.2025.1465001

15. Is boredom at work bad for your health? Examining the links between job boredom and autonomic nervous system dysfunction
Piia Seppälä, Lotta Harju, Jussi Virkkala, Jari J. Hakanen
Stress and Health  vol: 40  issue: 3  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1002/smi.3326

16. Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom
Shani Pindek, Alexandra Krajcevska, Paul E. Spector
Computers in Human Behavior  vol: 86  first page: 147  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.040

17. Revalidating the Boredom Proneness Scales Short From (BPS-SF)
Billy Sung, Sean Lee, Theodore Teow
Personality and Individual Differences  vol: 168  first page: 110364  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110364

18. The impact of working with an automated guided vehicle on boredom and performance: an experimental study in a warehouse environment
Ziagul Hosseini, Pascale M. Le Blanc, Evangelia Demerouti, Piet van Gool, Marieke van den Tooren, Paul T. Y. Preenen
International Journal of Production Research  vol: 64  issue: 5  first page: 1598  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2436640