Original Research
The psychometric properties of a workplace boredom scale (DUBS) within the South African context
Submitted: 08 November 2015 | Published: 13 May 2016
About the author(s)
Sumarie M. van Wyk, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South AfricaLeon T. de Beer, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Jaco Pienaar, WorkWell Research Unit, North-West University, South Africa
Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Research Unit Occupational & Organizational Psychology and Professional Learning, KU Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
Research purpose: To determine the psychometric properties of the Dutch Boredom Scale (DUBS) within the South African context. Motivation for the study: No reliable and valid scale for workplace boredom was available in South Africa at the time of the current research. Boredom at work has been found to affect organisations negatively in other countries. Insights are needed into workplace boredom and how it affects the outcomes of organisations in South Africa.
Research design, approach and method: A cross-sectional research approach was utilised. A random convenience sample (N = 490) was obtained from organisations within the manufacturing and logistics sector. In order to validate the DUBS, the factor structure, construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) and scale reliability were investigated. A mediation model was also tested with structural equation modelling to ascertain predictive validity.
Main findings: The results showed that the one-factor structure of the DUBS could be confirmed and that this factor had acceptable reliability. In terms of convergent validity, all of the item indicators loaded significantly on the workplace boredom construct, and the relationship between workplace boredom and work underload revealed that they were positively correlated with medium effect size. Furthermore, work engagement and organisational commitment were correlated negatively in terms of practical significance with workplace boredom. A structural mediation model showed that work underload was significantly and positively associated with boredom, which in turn had significant negative relations to both work engagement and organisational commitment. No significant direct relations were found from work underload to either work engagement or organisational commitment. Instead, bootstrapping showed that there was an indirect-only relationship from work underload to work engagement and organisational commitment through workplace boredom – indicating full mediation.
Practical/managerial implications: Management should not neglect workplace boredom, as results indicate that it may adversely impact work engagement and organisational commitment. Therefore, workplace boredom should be a concern not only for individuals, but also for the organisation at large.
Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to the limited research available on workplace boredom in South Africa by providing evidence of acceptable psychometric properties for a workplace boredom scale.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 9163Total article views: 10550
Crossref Citations
1. Safety through engaged workers: The link between Safety-II and work engagement
Franziska Homann, Caroline Limbert, Nicholas Bell, Peter Sykes
Safety Science vol: 146 first page: 105521 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105521
2. Work-related well-being in early career: A role of self-compassion
Kristýna Krejčová, Igor Krejčí, Hana Chýlová, Pavla Rymešová, Pavel Michálek
Heliyon vol: 11 issue: 1 first page: e41377 year: 2025
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41377
3. Time Flies When You’re Watching the Skies? Investigating Boredom in Aviation
Maximilian Peukert, Florian Ott, Lea-Sophie Vink
Transportation Research Procedia vol: 88 first page: 81 year: 2025
doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2025.05.010
4. Boredom and engagement at work: do they have different antecedents and consequences?
Michiko KAWADA, Akihito SHIMAZU, Daisuke MIYANAKA, Masahito TOKITA, Keiko SAKAKIBARA, Naana MORI, Fuad HAMSYAH, Lin YUHENG, Kojiro SHOJIMA, Wilmar B. SCHAUFELI
Industrial Health vol: 62 issue: 2 first page: 110 year: 2024
doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0028
5. Bored, angry, and overqualified? The high- and low-intensity pathways linking perceived overqualification to behavioural outcomes
Stephanie Andel, Shani Pindek, Maryana L. Arvan
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology vol: 31 issue: 1 first page: 47 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2021.1919624
6. Clarifying the inconsistently observed curvilinear relationship between workload and employee attitudes and mental well-being
Shani Pindek, Winny Shen, Cheryl E. Gray, Paul E. Spector
Work & Stress vol: 37 issue: 2 first page: 195 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/02678373.2022.2120562
7. Dutch Boredom Scale
Jonathan Peñalver, Esther Villajos, Amalia Raquel Pérez-Nebra
Occupational Medicine year: 2026
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqag009
8. Le management à distance est-il un remède à l’ennui du télétravail ? Une étude exploratoire auprès de « néo-télétravailleurs »
Alice Monnier, Clara Laborie, Emmanuel Abord de Chatillon, Alain Lacroux, Christelle Martin-Lacroux
Revue de gestion des ressources humaines vol: N° 129 issue: 3 first page: 3 year: 2023
doi: 10.3917/grhu.129.0003
9. The role of individual characteristics and working conditions in understanding boredom at work
Cecilia Toscanelli, Shagini Udayar, Ieva Urbanaviciute, Koorosh Massoudi
Personnel Review vol: 51 issue: 2 first page: 480 year: 2022
doi: 10.1108/PR-07-2020-0510
10. Analysis of the Determinants of Work-Life Balance (WLB) on Transportation Employees in China
Ying Meng, Kim Mee Chong, Tze Horng Tan, Ratneswary Rasiah
Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal vol: 8 issue: 26 first page: 437 year: 2023
doi: 10.21834/e-bpj.v8i26.5169
11. Predictores del agotamiento laboral por aburrimiento laboral en una muestra de trabajadores de la industria bancaria de Puerto Rico
Jesús M. Cruz Santiago, Abner Vélez Vega, Rita A. Vélez Alvarado
Informes psicológicos vol: 20 issue: 1 first page: 167 year: 2020
doi: 10.18566/infpsic.v20n1a11
12. Cuando el trabajo aburre: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Aburrimiento Laboral (EAL)
Miguel Martínez Lugo, Ramón Rodríguez-Montalbán
Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional vol: 35 issue: 1 first page: 7 year: 2017
doi: 10.21772/ripo.v35n1a01
13. Síndrome de Boredom en empresarios familiares del ramo automotriz
Carlos Jesús González Macías, Diego Adiel Sandoval Chávez, Ulises Mendoza Arvizo, Jesús Alberto Urrutia de la Garza
Revista Venezolana de Gerencia vol: 28 issue: 104 first page: 1627 year: 2023
doi: 10.52080/rvgluz.28.104.15
14. The Power of Place: The Impact of Real Estate on Work Success When Working From Home
Yassien Bachtal, Kyra Voll, Felix Gauger, Andreas Pfnür
German Journal of Real Estate Research vol: 11 issue: 1 first page: 3 year: 2025
doi: 10.3790/gjrer.2025.1465001
15. Is boredom at work bad for your health? Examining the links between job boredom and autonomic nervous system dysfunction
Piia Seppälä, Lotta Harju, Jussi Virkkala, Jari J. Hakanen
Stress and Health vol: 40 issue: 3 year: 2024
doi: 10.1002/smi.3326
16. Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom
Shani Pindek, Alexandra Krajcevska, Paul E. Spector
Computers in Human Behavior vol: 86 first page: 147 year: 2018
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.040
17. Revalidating the Boredom Proneness Scales Short From (BPS-SF)
Billy Sung, Sean Lee, Theodore Teow
Personality and Individual Differences vol: 168 first page: 110364 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110364
18. The impact of working with an automated guided vehicle on boredom and performance: an experimental study in a warehouse environment
Ziagul Hosseini, Pascale M. Le Blanc, Evangelia Demerouti, Piet van Gool, Marieke van den Tooren, Paul T. Y. Preenen
International Journal of Production Research vol: 64 issue: 5 first page: 1598 year: 2026
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2436640