Original Research

Use of differential item functioning (DIF) analysis for bias analysis in test construction

Marié De Beer
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 30, No 4 | a175 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v30i4.175 | © 2004 Marié De Beer | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 October 2004 | Published: 26 October 2004

About the author(s)

Marié De Beer, UNISA, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (206KB)

Abstract

When differential item functioning (DIF) item analysis procedures based on item response theory (IRT) are used during test construction, it is possible to draw item characteristic curves for the same item for different subgroups. These curves indicate how each item functions at various ability levels for different subgroups. DIF is indicated by the area between the curves. In the construction of the Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (LPCAT), this method was used to identify items that indicated bias in terms of gender, culture, language or level of education. Items that exceeded a predetermined amount of DIF were discarded from the final item bank, irrespective of which subgroup was being advantaged or disadvantaged. The process and results of the DIF analysis are discussed.

Opsomming
Waar differensiële itemfunksioneringsprosedures (DIF-prosedures) vir itemontleding gebaseer op itemresponsteorie (IRT) tydens toetskonstruksie gebruik word, is dit moontlik om itemkarakteristiekekrommes vir dieselfde item vir verskillende subgroepe voor te stel. Hierdie krommes dui aan hoe elke item vir die verskillende subgroepe op verskillende vermoënsvlakke te funksioneer. DIF word aangetoon deur die area tussen die krommes. DIF is in die konstruksie van die 'Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive test (LPCAT)' gebruik om die items te identifiseer wat sydigheid ten opsigte van geslag, kultuur, taal of opleidingspeil geopenbaar het. Items wat ’n voorafbepaalde vlak van DIF oorskry het, is uit die finale itembank weggelaat, ongeag die subgroep wat bevoordeel of benadeel is. Die proses en resultate van die DIF-ontleding word bespreek.


Keywords

Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis; Test construction

Metrics

Total abstract views: 6274
Total article views: 9827

 

Crossref Citations

1. Constructions of the literacy competence levels of multilingual students
Lars Holm
Language and Education  vol: 31  issue: 5  first page: 449  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1080/09500782.2017.1305397

2. Validity and Reliability of Barakat-Johnson Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Knowledge Tool: A Methodological Study
Meryem Yildiz Ayvaz, Tuğba Erdem, Ayişe Karadağ
Advances in Skin & Wound Care  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000497

3. Gender bias and gender differences in two South African tests of academic literacy
Frans van der Slik
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies  vol: 27  issue: 3  first page: 277  year: 2009  
doi: 10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.3.4.938

4. Cross-cultural differences in social desirability scales: Influence of cognitive ability
Aletta Odendaal
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology  vol: 41  issue: 1  year: 2015  
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1259

5. A comparative analysis of the OECD/INFE financial knowledge assessment using the Rasch model
Bernadene de Clercq
Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training  vol: 11  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1186/s40461-019-0083-1

6. Social Network Addiction Scale: The Validity and Reliability Study of Adolescent and Adult Form
İbrahim GÖKDAŞ, Yaşar KUZUCU
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education  vol: 6  issue: 3  first page: 396  year: 2019  
doi: 10.21449/ijate.505863

7. Detecting Multidimensional Differential Item Functioning with the Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes Model, the Item Response Theory Likelihood Ratio Test, and Logistic Regression
Okan Bulut, Youngsuk Suh
Frontiers in Education  vol: 2  year: 2017  
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00051