Original Research

Do job autonomy and negotiation self-efficacy improve employment relationships?

Peter R A Oeij
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 32, No 2 | a229 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v32i2.229 | © 2006 Peter R A Oeij | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 29 October 2006 | Published: 29 October 2006

About the author(s)

Peter R A Oeij,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (123KB)

Abstract

This study investigated whether improving the employment relationship does more depend on negotiation selfefficacy or on task outonomy for a sample of employees from a Dutch telecom company. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the effects of negotiation self-efficacy and task autonomy on integrative negotiation and the effect of integrative negotiation on psychological contract breach. Results indicate that employees negotiate more integratively when they have higher negotiation self-efficacy, compared to employees with more task autonomy. Empirical support was found for the prediction that higher negotiation self-efficacy and task autonomy correlates with less psychological contract breach.

Keywords

Negotiation self-efficacy; Task autonomy; Psychological contract breach

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5613
Total article views: 5842

 

Crossref Citations

1. Negotiating Individual Employment Relations, Evidence from four Dutch Organizations
Jan de Leede, Rien Huiskamp, Peter Oeij, Aukje Nauta, Anneke Goudswaard, Tobias Kwakkelstein
Interventions économiques  vol: 35  year: 2007  
doi: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.634

2. Commitment to a parent company and a local operation
Phuong Nguyen, Jörg Felfe, Insa Fooken, Ho Thuy Ngoc
Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship  vol: 3  issue: 2  first page: 181  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1108/EBHRM-05-2013-0013

3. Impact of Ethical Leadership on Employee Turnover Intentions in the Construction Industry
Yongkui Li, Mohsin Ali Soomro, Ali Nawaz Khan, Yilong Han, Rui Xue
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management  vol: 148  issue: 7  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002303