Original Research
Differential item functioning of the UWES-17 in South Africa
Submitted: 26 February 2010 | Published: 15 November 2011
About the author(s)
Leanne Goliath-Yarde, University of Johannesburg, South AfricaGert Roodt, University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Research purpose: This study assesses the Differential Item Functioning (DIF) of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-17) for different South African cultural groups in a South African company.
Motivation for the study: Organisations are using the UWES-17 more and more in South Africa to assess work engagement. Therefore, research evidence from psychologists or assessment practitioners on its DIF across different cultural groups is necessary.
Research design, approach and method: The researchers conducted a Secondary Data Analysis (SDA) on the UWES-17 sample (n = 2429) that they obtained from a cross-sectional survey undertaken in a South African Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector company (n = 24 134). Quantitative item data on the UWES-17 scale enabled the authors to address the research question.
Main findings: The researchers found uniform and/or non-uniform DIF on five of the vigour items, four of the dedication items and two of the absorption items. This also showed possible Differential Test Functioning (DTF) on the vigour and dedication dimensions.
Practical/managerial implications: Based on the DIF, the researchers suggested that organisations should not use the UWES-17 comparatively for different cultural groups or employment decisions in South Africa.
Contribution/value add: The study provides evidence on DIF and possible DTF for the UWES-17. However, it also raises questions about possible interaction effects that need further investigation.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4501Total article views: 10365
Crossref Citations
1. The relationship between readiness to change and work engagement: A case study in an accounting firm undergoing change
Megan Matthysen, Chantel Harris
SA Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 16 year: 2018
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.855